Modeling topic

LAJ in HO... beginnings

Going to play around with this blogging thingie... so, hi :)

Took the first step of constructing the Los Angeles Junction in HO.  If it looks like a Free-mo module it is (or was - its being re-purposed).

aerotrain's picture

streamline resurrection - the really big streamliners (II)

Currently under construction is UP's M-10005 'City of Denver' in 1.7"-scale ´(running on 7 1/4" tracks).

Kind of a step-by-step visualization of the construction:

Frame and driveline


 

Basic subconstruction of the shell - the nose-core is shaped of foam and will be removed later

Clear plexiglass edging protection

Ever wonder how to stop those sharp edges on clear Plexiglas edging on model railroad layouts?   Try clear car door edging strips available at automotive departments/stores in your area.

Apparent loss of signal

Have an aged [probably 10 years old] Digitrax DB150 and had just started a running session when locos stopped. I was using my UT4 throttle. Relative light indicators were lit on the DB150 and green light lit on throttle when I dialled up the loco. No response from loco. I was running an analogue loco on "OO". The loco was " humming" which indicated to me that power was in the track.Any suggestions please? Thanks - Tom

Lets see your passenger trains/equipment

Love to see passenger trains and cars. 

These are all I have collected and I rarely run them due to having no continuous operation layout.

 

 

barr_ceo's picture

Foamcore framed T-Trak module

I'm in the process of planning the framework for a T-Trak interchange module. Track plan can be seen in the post below. Here's the question:

How tightly can Foamcore be bent?

I have three options I'm considering:

1) Plain rectangular module - Takes of a lot of extra real estate, but definitely the simplest build.

2) Cut corners - the "empty" corners of the module cut off to give an angled "near diamond" shape to the module. Doesn't require bending, but also doesn't give a smoothly flowing shape.

newly in HO-code 70?

Good day modelers! I have a question. May be an answer in here already but I haven't found it. Anyway, recently made switch from N to HO. (perfect eyesight 5 years ago has degenerated rapidly) I loved N but my recent switch and subsequent planning for a switching layout has brought me many new possibilities and decisions.

Going to use code 70 or 83 rail. Any opinions? My question, specifically, will most modern RTR rolling stock and locos work on code 70 and/or 83 rail?

Stan Shields's picture

New track plan, need suggestions...

The track plan for the new project is attached, would appreciate any suggestions for structures, scenes, etc. It's David Meek's basic idea with the existing 2X8 ft section of the old layout added to it...

 

 

David Calhoun's picture

Truck Tuning Problems

I normally pride myself in solving problems that pop up like little gremlins on my railroad. Recently completing a reefer with all those little plastic parts that seem to disappear by jumping off the model and/or the surface you're working on, I ran into a problem I have never seen before.


>> Posts index Syndicate content


Journals/Blogs

Recent Blog posts: