Bessemer Bob

Mr. Six had done an excellent job recently document his one town approach to modeling. 

 

That got me thinking about a one industry concept for a further "downsizing" of the railroad. 

 

Anybody modeling a one industry layout?  Tell us what you model and why. 

Think before you post, try to be positive, and you do not always have to give your  opinion……

Steel Mill Modelers SIG, it’s a blast(furnace)!

Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

Couple of references

Dear Bob, For "one industry" info, check out Lance Mindheim's blog and articles, and keep firmly in-line that car-spots or sure-spots are your friend... (An industry with multiple discrete/explicit car-spots> an industry with unit or rake-train consists, esp when layout space is tight...) Also worth researching ZTS, SPINS, and CLIC documents (and allied FOGchart docs). These are the "car spot" bibles respective prototype RRs use/d for their industrial/switching locations... Happy modelling, Aim to Improve, Prof Klyzlr Ps I also model logging RRs, which could be argued as being "single industry", esp on NG where there is no wider interchange Ops, but logging RRs have other appeals all their own....
Reply 0
Ken Rice

Not quite one but close

A nifty example of a close to one industry layout is Jack Hill's New Castle Industrial Railroad:

http://oscalewcor.blogspot.com/search/label/NCIR%20TRACK%20PLAN

A nice description of operating it: http://oscalewcor.blogspot.com/search/label/NCIR%20OPERATIONS

And while you're there poke around on the rest of his blog - some excellent descriptions of real industries:

http://oscalewcor.blogspot.com/search/label/INSPIRATION

Reply 0
Oztrainz

Single industry example - An Aussie coal mine in the mid-1920's

Hi Bob and all,

Does an Aussie coalmine count? Here's the plan

%20Final.jpg 

Operations are relatively simple. Load narrow-gauge coal skips underground and transport them to the incline for emptying and then return the empty skips from the incline top to the mine for re-filling. This involves 2 locomotive swaps in each direction. Trains run at such a rate to ensure that there are always loaded coal skips at the incline top. The incline is designed to send a skip downhill at about every minute and have at least 2 skips visible on each leg of the incline. Incline operations are designed for "hands-free" operations. At the foot of the incline, the coal skips are emptied and then returned to the incline top, The sizing and loading of the coal into standard-gauge wagons is also simulated on this layout.   

And here's the why? - liberated from elsewhere in the Corrimal Colliery Incline thread

Quote:

I suppose if you are going to attempt something that hasn't been done before, then you'd better have one or more good reasons WHY you should want to expend the effort of trying to build such a layout. For the Corrimal Colliery Incline layout, these reasons basically boiled down to:

  • Be unique - No-one had done it before. So hopefully this should add to the "marketabilility" of this layout after it was built when it came to being invited to attend exhibition as an exhibitor sometime in the future. At the time we didn't realise just how many good reasons there were why this type of an incline had not been modelled previously.
  • Be multi-exhibition suitable - Most model railway exhibition layouts are built solely for model railway exhibitions. By taking a slightly different slant, we reckoned that we could build a layout that would also be suitably attractive for local, mining and history functions as well as just model railway exhibitions. This should allow the "exhibitable life" of the layout to be much more fully utilised than by just attending a limited number of model railway exhibitions.
  • Be educational -  to show the process of mining, transporting, and handling coal, as was done historically locally in a "reasonably' prototypical manner.

As for intellectual and modelling challenges, They are an additional "Why?" Or perhaps "why not?". Even though this mine was one of the better documented coal mines in the local area, almost everything apart from the locomotive mechanisms, track and figures has had to be scratchbuilt. 

Now, given that this layout is planned to be portable and be viewed by the general public at different venues, these reasons will probably be considerably different than for the reasons for choosing to build a "One Industry Layout" in a fixed location, such as a home layout or at a dedicated clubhouse. But these reasons were sufficiently valid justification for the build team on why we should proceed to the build stage on this layout. As I said in the title of the main thread, it's "a different slant on rails".  

You did ask...  

Regards,

John Garaty

Unanderra in oz

Read my Blog

Reply 0
Virginian and Lake Erie

Bob, as near as I could tell

Bob, as near as I could tell a one Industry layout could be anything from a micro layout serving a single structure, to a basement filler serving a steel mill. Other Industries for a larger than micro layout could be a coal mine, an automobile plant, a chemical plant, a paper mill, a refinery, a glass plant, a brewery, and for something really different a large passenger terminal.

The passenger terminal could have a station, locomotive servicing, post office, and baggage and express area. Staging could run the trains in and they could then be switched and the power serviced and or changed. Lots of things could be used as a unifying theme and provide a smaller layout with lots of action.

Reply 0
Rich_S

One Industry Ideas....

Isn't a One Industry layout just another name for a Inglenook? Sure the Inglenook idea covers all aspects of the layout, from number of sidings to how the Inglenook is operated, but at it's core isn't a Inglenook a One Industry layout? For ideas for a One Industry layout, you can draw ideas from the various Inglenook layouts designs.

Rob, you bring up a very good point as well. I've seen dozens of Steel Mill railroads that service one steel company, but within the layout are several destinations. Most notably, the blast furnaces, open hearth furnace, rolling mills, material handling, Engine house and car repair buildings, etc. The integrated mill to the passer by may look like just one big industry, but to the steel mill and employees they were separate mills within the complex. 

John brings up another good point. Many coal mines could probably be one industry layouts as well. One in my area received coal via a narrow gauge mine railroad, washed and sized the coal in the on site prep plant and then loaded the coal into open hoppers. There were 4 tracks dedicated to loading washed and sized coal and the hoppers were moved via gravity as the entire empty and loaded yards were build on a slight grade. The location also had a small machine shop plus the associated employee building and the ever present company town on the hill. 

 

 

Cheers,

Rich S.

Reply 0
UglyK5

Oztrainz: one can tell how

Oztrainz: one can tell how fun that layout is to operate, look how happy those guys are!!!

but seriously... one industry or one/two turnout layout could be great fun, sounds like you want something simple not a single industry that’s huge.  Car spots for a variety of cars add some nice mix in the action.  This could also be done with a few smaller industries on one longish  siding.  

jeff

—————————————
“Think before you post, try to be positive, and you do not always have to give your opinion.....”
-Bessemer Bob
Reply 0
George Sinos gsinos

A different example - Can Co

Back in the 70s, I worked in the Continental Can plant here in Omaha. The photo is an aerial from the 90s.  It's a bit different than my memory, but that was a long time ago.

There were at least 12, maybe 14 production lines.  They made empty soda pop cans, beer cans, spam cans, pear shaped ham cans, small sausage cans, and several others I don't remember. But the empty cans were shipped all over the country by rail and truck.

h%20rail.jpg 

This plant was big. You can see the cars and trucks on the street for scale.

The "steel" track was for incoming coils and stacks of sheet steel on pallets. 

The "outside" track was uncovered.  In the year I was there, I didn't see much there.  The facility manager told me a tank car of fuel for the heating system (I think) could be unloaded there.

The next to tracks went to the loading dock.  One track was always full of boxcars being loaded with outgoing product.  The other had a single gon with outgoing scrap, and misc. incoming large equipment.

When I was there - I don't think the scrap track actually extended into the building. It always had a few empty gons, waiting to be swapped in for loads of outgoing scrap.

I talked to one engineer that served the plant - he said they were contracted to switch the plant every 12 hours.  I've read about a larger plant in Chicago that was switched every 4 hours.

A compressed version of this is on one end of my switching layout.   It can take quite a while to switch.  If I ever expand the layout it will be enlarged a bit, and will likely be the central industry.

By the way - the old 3-piece steel cans that were once common are not so common any more.  Aluminum cans have mainly replaced them.  the tracks have been removed. The loading dock seems to have been removed.  The building houses at least 2 or three different companies now.

gs

Reply 0
ctxmf74

one terminal

  Instead of one industry why not one terminal served by car float? That way there can be more variety of rolling stock and operations. Harlem Transfer, or C&O Norfolk Va. terminal are good examples....DaveB

Reply 0
Bessemer Bob

Great Posts

All, 

 

some pretty interesting reply's so far. 

 

truth be told this really is not for my planning of a layout, just curious about the idea. 

 

A while back I had planned a layout based off the one industry approach myself. It never did get off paper, but here is the idea.

 

A single industry was located on the end of a long spur 2-3 miles from a class 1 main. Switching the plant was a slow process and car loads were too low for the Class 1 to really care.  The factory continued to reduce the amount of product received by rail due to the lack of service from the class one.  Soon the spur was up for abandonment and steps in a small start up railroad. With potential industrial/commercial zoned land parcels along the ROW and a customer that could be convinced to again receive more product by rail the short line was born. 

* one interesting note for me was to make the line a dead end with no run-around. That would allow me the operator to run all the way with a shoving platform. At the end there is just a switch into the factory with a few hundred feet of track (main line) to perform the swapping of cars, and a potential expansion of the layout. 

Think before you post, try to be positive, and you do not always have to give your  opinion……

Steel Mill Modelers SIG, it’s a blast(furnace)!

Reply 0
Ken Rice

Grafton and Upton

The Grafton and Update Railroad, a local shortline here in eastern Mass, was basically a one industry railroad for some years up to 2008, when a new owner took over and has rebuilt it's traffic and physical plant impressively.

In it's one industry days it ran less than a mile from the interchange with CSX in North Grafton, MA, down to the Washington Mills plant, also in North Grafton, using an Alco S-2 for power.  There was a second offline customer who got the occasional boxcar at the freighthouse (teamtrack?) in North Grafton - Weetabix if I remember right.  Some photos from that time period:

http://photos.nerail.org/s/?p=70383

http://photos.nerail.org/s/?p=97431

http://photos.nerail.org/s/?p=102460

http://photos.nerail.org/s/?p=104343

Modeling the G&U in that time period would make a nice small one industry railroad.  And if you want to start with a small layout and expand it later, well, the real G&U has done just that and now sports several MP15s as well as some older power, lots more track and customers, and a lot more carloads.

Reply 0
Bessemer Bob

G&U and Cont. Can

G&U is a really interesting RR. We did a small job for them years ago, and to this day I follow along on the Mike and Scotty podcast to see whats the latest with the G&U.... Its quickly growing and changing and far from the one industry RR it once was. Hats off to that team!

 

Cont Can is a great example of how a single industry can provide interesting operations.  With the box cars you can even have some car routing for re-loads as well. 

Think before you post, try to be positive, and you do not always have to give your  opinion……

Steel Mill Modelers SIG, it’s a blast(furnace)!

Reply 0
Oztrainz

@ Jeff, re happy

Hi Jeff, Bob, and all,

The happy operators are only happy when everything is working well. The coal mine idea does suffer visually when compared to some other single industries in that all coal skips look alike. but that's one of the trade offs when modelling any type of a mine. What you haul the "mined stuff" away in is usually lots of similar looking wagons. 

But the Corrimal mine is relying heavily on the visual impact and the action on the incline. The run back and forth to the mine with the steam tramway around Brokers Nose and the underground run to reload the skips are basically "yo-yo" runs from the exchange yard at the mine to support the incline. There is a defined series of moves that have to be carried out within a specific time, otherwise the incline stops.

The logistics of this layout:  

When the incline is running at full capacity, tipping at about a skip/minute, about 500 skips will be tipped in an 8-hour exhibition day. For a "designed train length" of 11 skips, about 50 trains of loaded skips have to head out from the mine and 50 trains of empty skips have to be got back from the incline top along the stretch of single track around Brokers Nose. This means that about once in every 5 minutes a train of skips will head out around Brokers Nose. Each train takes about 2 to 3 minutes to traverse the run between the mine and incline top.     

In Summary

There is a kind of choreography for moving stuff in industry where stuff has the be moved by certain times otherwise something stops somewhere in the chain of action inside that industry. Getting your head around this concept is perhaps the key to successfully modelling a single industry of whatever size.   

Regards,

John Garaty

Unanderra in oz

Read my Blog

Reply 0
Sugar Beet Guy

Sugar Beet Industry

I model the Colorado Great Western Railway.  It's main focus is the sugar beet refining business and all supporting activities. it's a large layout with three sugar beet factories. Each factory receives raw materials, primarily sugar beets from farms in the area. Lots of other materials are used in the refining process: coal, coke, limestone, acids and sundry supplies like burlap bags for packed sugar, Each factory ships finished products off line, to each other and to various local businesses. Plenty of varied traffic on local turns. 

See my website (URL below) or my blog https://forum.mrhmag.com/journals-was-blogs-891775 for details.

 

George Booth
Director of Everything, The New Great Western Railway
http://users.frii.com/gbooth/Trains/index.htm

Reply 0
Joe Baker

Paper Mills

Paper mills provide a ton of operational interest and the prototypes come in various sizes, depending on what they produce, that may suite your needs.

Here's what I've developed for my layout. You can see all the potential inbound / outbound loads. The mill could be serviced by a local freight and mill switcher or just a local freight. I've chosen to operate mine with a pair of mill owned switchers. With a bit more room, an interchange yard could be added that is serviced by a local freight and the mill switcher.

This layout is still fairly large, but much smaller than a basement empire.

%20Final.jpg 

 

Reply 1
Bessemer Bob

Paper

Paper is a great industry to model. 

That is on my list for a potential once I get settled into the long term home, whenever that day comes lol

 

Think before you post, try to be positive, and you do not always have to give your  opinion……

Steel Mill Modelers SIG, it’s a blast(furnace)!

Reply 0
David Husman dave1905

Hmmm

I am always intrigued by the concept of the "one industry" layout.  Why?

The key is a good track plan and the switching operation.  Whether its one industry or 20 industries, it really doesn't matter.  You can take any good track plan and make it one industry or multiple industries, and overlay any number of industries over the top of it (with a few exceptions for industries that have unique track arrangements, such as a coal mine).  Actually that was my suggestion for a small switching layout in an article published by Kalmbach, to build a small switching layout with just blank "pads" where the industries go, then swap around different industries to change the switching patterns.

For example the building above in Omaha could be 3 industries and have as much operation as one industry (drive by that building almost weekly, its now a Goodwill Industries center.)

Dave Husman

Visit my website :  https://wnbranch.com/

Blog index:  Dave Husman Blog Index

Reply 0
ray o

VIP PET FOODS

%20spots.jpg 

I have an exhibition layout here in the UK, based around a vegetarian pet food factory, it has two Alco S2's as plant switchers the whole concept works quiet well.

Reply 0
Greg Baker Mountaingoatgreg

Sawmill

I have tossed the idea around a large sawmill complex. This could include a woods railroad that brings logs to the log pond. The railroad could include all the support structures of the small railroad and spending on era could be everything from a small lean too or large roundhouse. 

As for the mill if it was a large mill you could have multiple spots as many mills did lots of different things with the lumber. You could include the regular sawmill, box factory, small stock etc. In later eras you could include loading woodchips or using them for MDF or Flakeboard. 

Another part of the more modern sawmill is the use of resin (glue) which arrives in tank cars as raw materials and also shipped as finished material to other plants  

There was a huge Weyerhaeuser plant in Springfield that included a number of different sawmills and a paperplant. They also had their own railroad which operated until the 1980’s.    

Reply 0
Logger01

... intrigued by the concept of the "one industry" layout. Why?

Quote:

... intrigued by the concept of the "one industry" layout.  Why?

Dave, For one major reason - you can actually model an entire operation to scale. You can actually "complete" the layout.

I am working with a young modeler on a "scale" modular layout of the railroad junction / exchange, tannery and village of Walland, TN  and includes the following features and more:

  • Rural Train Station with freight platforms situated in the wye,
  • Tannery with five or six sidings,
  • Wye to tannery which crosses Little River on Covered RR - Auto - Wagon - Pedestrian Bridge,
  • Village of Walland,
  • Exchange Point between Little River RR and Southern RR (Knoxville and Augusta RR),
  • Turntable in a corn field,
  • Runaround track near turntable,
  • For back country in the 1920's up to 1937 long 9+ car passenger trains ,
  • Mixed goods, tan bark, lumber trains,
  • Tourist excursion trains,
  • 0-4-0, 2-6-0, 2-6-2, 4-6-2, 2-4-4-2, 4-6-0 Steamers and could potentially run a Shay,
  • more.

. The area being modeled is about half a mile long and one-quarter of a mile wide so in N scale the scale layout will only be about 16 feet long with one module branching off near the middle. This modular layout will easily fit in the back 20" x 16" foot section of the basement. Since a scale layout in HO would only need about thirty feet, we could, by wrapping around the walls, almost build the layout an HO version in the same space only having to scale down the Tannery.

Ken K

gSkidder.GIF 

Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

End of Spur...

Dear Ray, Wow, can't recall ever seeing the trackplan for "the Spur", now some of the pics make much more sense... Happy Modelling, Aiming to orient myself correctly, Prof Klyzlr
Reply 0
mike horton

Skaneatleles short line,

Ran in upstate New York , served a stauffer plant, I believe, former NYC line, went about eight miles to connect to PC. Plant paid to upgrade line to handle heavy covered hoppers.

Reply 0
Bessemer Bob

Timber Industry

Timber seems to be one that really lends itself to modeling a "one industry" layout. 

 

Sawmills, paper mills, well that popped a good one into my mind. 

 

On the Allagash at Andover ME is the Andover Wood Products chipper facility. Simple yet could lend itself to a fun single industry to model. 

Think before you post, try to be positive, and you do not always have to give your  opinion……

Steel Mill Modelers SIG, it’s a blast(furnace)!

Reply 0
Oztrainz

Steel

Hi all, 

This thread could probably do with a review when taling about a 1 industry plant. However buried in that thread was "A different perspective" posting about moving stuff in the Australian steel industry. I'll post some of the relevant bits here:

Quote:

It was not my job to run the trains, however in several roles in different parts of the plant it was my job to get wagon swapped or moved.  So this is written from a different perspective in a country other than the US ,as operated in a different time under different industrial and operating rules. This is written from the industry "side of the tracks" 

To set the scene -

By the time I started in the mid-1970's, steam operations were done and the plant was fully dieselised with a fleet of 45  diesel locomotives of varying capabilities, with the earliest dating from the early 1950's. The plant was split into operating departments like coke ovens,  #1 Plant Blast Furnaces, Plate Mill, Slab Yard, etc. Railway operations were the responsibility of the Traffic Department. The Traffic Department itself was split into several operational areas, each with its own operating radio frequency, with in some cases captive locomotives and rolling stock. All movements were done under radio direction. In at least two roles I held, I was working closely (next desk) to the road foremen controlling rail movements in these different operational areas inside the plant.

If wagons had to be moved from one area to another, the road foreman in the originating area, would call up the loco crew and and give them the go to a certain point where they would switch frequencies, call up the other area's road foreman and request permission to proceed. Once given, the loco would switch back to the originating area and advise they were leaving the area, then switch back to the new area's radio frequency. There was also a direct line phone network between the road foremen in each area. This was used to both alert the receiving area that they had a train on the way, and perhaps to find out how things were going for an ETA of the locomotive and crew coming back to its originating area.   

Operationally there were 4 basic scenarios, and some subtle variations.

  1. dedicated yo-yo service inside the plant - where the locomotive never uncoupled from the consist and the run was between 2 points. This was used in high frequency areas - for example between the Slab Caster Yard and the Slap Yard. Slabs would be loaded on dedicated flatcars by overhead crane at the slab caster and would be unloaded by overhead crane at the Slab Yard, and the train would return empty to the Slab Caster Yard for another load of slabs. 
  2. dedicated yo-yo service with cars being left, and the locomotive staying with the consist, but with drop-off and re-couple moves. In most cases this was to move the locomotive to a safer spot during loading and unloading of the wagons. An example of this was the hot metal run between blast furnaces and the steelmaking shops. The locomotive would spot the hot-metal torpedo ladles under the blast furnace casthouse floor. The furnace would tap and fill the torpedo ladles with molten iron at about 1500 degrees Celsius. Usually the locomotive would uncouple and sit just clear of the casthouse. Once the cast was ended, the locomotive would move in and couple couple up to the full ladles. Any empty ladles would be moved to the earlier spots for the next cast, then the full torpedo ladles would head off to the steel-making shops.   

    My photo of one of these trains was lifted was from a video stillframe shot many years ago These torpedo ladles carried up to 250 tons of molten iron and weighed in at over 100 tons empty. There are another 3 full torpedo ladles out of shot. Note the traffic lights on the pole in the foreground. These are for rail movements. More on that later

    ​At the steel-making shop the torpedo ladles would be spotted at the pouring station, handbrakes tied down, power attached. The locomotive would move clear before the hot-metal was poured into ladles that would be moved by overhead cranes to the steel-making furnace for charging. After pouring the locomotive would re-attach to the torpedo lades, pump up the air, unplug the power, release the handbrakes and the head back to the blast furnace in time for the now empty torpedo ladles to be spotted under the furnace for the next tap. 

    The reason that the locomotive stayed close at the Blast Furnace  was that if anything went wrong above the ladle, or the ladle lining failed, or the torpedo ladle was overfilled, then the locomotive would race in, couple up and drag the torpedo ladle clear before it became welded to the rails under the furnace and the bearings got cooked  This was seriously scary stuff and thankfully it only happened rarely. I saw it happen twice in about 10 years. One of those times involved 3 locomotives trying to break 2 torpedo ladles out from a rapidly solidifying large puddle of molten iron that was around all the wheels of one of those torpedo ladles like in the photo above..
     
  3. Yard-Plant-Yard transfer -  a variation of  #2 where the cars are picked up from the yard, dropped off somewhere inside the plant, and the locomotive goes to do another job elsewhere on the plant while loading or unloading occurs. This was the majority of the work.
  4. External to plant - A limited number of locomotives and a limited number of crews worked trains of coal hoppers over part of the Government railway network to service collieries nearby that were owned by the steelworks. These were operated under the Government railway rules and signalling system and are not applicable in-plant operations.   

Controlling access in plant fell into 3 basic scenarios

  1. Wagons stabled in an area controlled by Traffic - the wagons were dropped off on the nominated track, and tied down usually the handbrake on the wagon leading out from the siding or loop. The loco was then assigned to another job. Pick up was the reverse of this procedure - couple up, connect the air and release any handbrakes that were set. Before departing the siding, ensure the handbrake of the new wagon leading out was set if any wagons were to be left 
  2. Areas controlled by other operating department - It was the other department's job to request the shunt and also to ensure that the wagons were safe to move BEFORE giving permission to their area. Usually access was controlled by either gates (usually for external trackage) or access lights above the door for tracks inside buildings.These access lights were re-purposed road traffic signals as shown in the photo above. 
    How it usually worked: The locomotive and train would arrive at the door. There was a switch that activated a siren. This acted as the call for the foreman to grant access for the train. In some cases the access light control switches were in  elevated pulpits, but in a lot of cases the switch was near the door and the foreman or authorised person would walk to the door, checking the wagons were safe to move while on the way. The foreman would throw the electrical switch activating a green light above the door that also extinguished the usually-displayed red light light. The siren was sounded while the loco was moving inside the building. On departure, the siren was sounded while the train departed the building and the lights were switched back to display red once the train locomotive had finished shunting that track and was clear of the building.
  3. The shunting yard (interchange) between the Government and Steelworks networks. I'm not sure how these were worked but I think that  these tracks were worked as for #1, with liaison being required between the Government railways train control and Traffic for access for their trains to these shared yard tracks.

These operations ran 24-hours a day, every day of the year. There was always something moving somewhere on rails inside the plant. In those days only the locomotives had radios. All train movements were directed by the shunter on the ground or leading wagon using hand-signals and light signals from a white/red/green torch at night. On a wet rainy night, it was not a good time to be working on the train crew around a steelworks. Anything hot became a mobile steam cloud, adding to any other visibility problems. .

There is not much glamour in industrial shunting, just an awful lot of hard work in sometimes dimly lit, hot and often otherwise unpleasant surroundings, and sometimes in tight confines. 

So how might this be applied to a steel industry layout? - If you get lucky with were you draw the dividing line then perhaps you can get 2 smaller single-industry layouts from a larger integrated steelworks.

Layout 1 - Processes to the start of steelmaking - This would include coke ovens, coke ovens by-products and gas treatment, sinter plant, blast furnace(s), desiliconiser, and the pouring station at the steelmaking shop.

Layout 2 - Processes downstream of the steelmaking shop -  Teeming pit at steelmaking shop, stripper house, mould house, slab caster dispatch, slab yard, rolling mills (plate and or strip), downstream strip or plate processing, dispatch to customer via exchange yard. 

If you want, these 2 layouts can be further broken down into traffic flows and by scenarios 1-4 above with possibly another scenario - another minor variation of yo-yo service Scenario #3 with the wagons being left  for loading/unloading while the locomotive went and did another job, but with the run being exclusively captive to the plant and not out to the transfer yard. (Scenario 3a??)

Regards,

John Garaty

Unanderra in oz

Read my Blog

Reply 0
RyanAK

Neat concept...

Neat concept, and one I’ve been thinking about a lot lately. I enjoy the history of central Pennsylvania around the turn of the century, so I’ll add some thoughts from that place and era, from small-ish to big.

  • Creamery - milk was an important commodity coming out of a lot of rural communities and going to customers in cities of all sizes. Creameries would receive shipments of milk by rail or wagon and send processed milk down the line. Besides the raw milk, the plant may also receive fuel for the boiler house and other miscellaneous shipments. Some also had an ice house for icing reefers. A small, rural creamery would make a pretty neat little layout. 
  • Other agriculture - an entire agriculture community operates like a small industry. Lots of raw materials (seed, feed, fertilizer, building materials, machinery, etc.) come in, and all sorts of ag products go out (livestock, milk, grain or processed grain products, produce, wool, etc.). This ag “industry” could include livestock pens, grain elevators, mills, feed/seed co-op, produce house, ice house, and a TON of varied traffic.
  • Cannery - lots of stuff ended up in cans. Traffic would be raw product, cans, and fuel in. Canned product out. Another great choice for a small layout. 
  • Tannery - the leather industry was a bigger economic driver in the early 20th century than many people realize. These were often very large rural industries. At Muncy Valley, PA, the tannery received bark on the 3’ narrow gauge Eagles Mere Railroad. Hides, fuel and other goods arrived on the Williamsport & North Branch, and processed leather left by the W&NB. So much to model on the tannery itself, and the rail traffic is diverse. A layout based on this prototype even gives you an opportunity to model interesting narrow and standard gauge short lines working a single industry. 
  • Lime kilns - I’m still researching, but another small, eminently modelable industry.
  • Timber - oh, my. The diversity. Briefly, some options that were going on in my area and era of interest. These can be as small or extensive as you’d like, and while it would seem like the traffic was basically logs in-product out, it can be more diversified once you take a close look at the prototypes. Many of these were also served by neat narrow gauge logging railroads and supported either a camp, company town, or full-blown, diverse communities. These would make for great small, medium or large one-industry layouts. 
    • Mine props
    • Pulp wood
    • Kindling mill
    • Tannery bark
    • Clothespin mill/factory
    • Broom and tool handle mill/factory
    • Rough lumber mill
    • Planed, finished lumber mill
    • Shingle mill
    • Barrel stave mill
    • Wood chemical plants
  • Coal - another industry that can be as small or large as you like. From a small, backwoods tipple operated by three men and a mule, to behemoth breakers, there’s great diversity to provide interesting layouts of all sizes. I always thought a small drift mine on a short spur would make an interesting, small switching layout. Bernice, PA could really make for a great, extensive, room filling layout with a minimum of compression. 
  • Steel - the large mills are pretty intimidating to me, so I’ve been researching some of the small, rural, early furnaces that were in my area and era. 

This is a great concept. I’ll certainly be watching to see what else is suggested!

Reply 0
Reply