Joe Atkinson IAISfan

Several times lately I've seen posts on the forum where the author is replying with a question or comment to a general thread with a number of previous posts by various authors (e.g. the Weekly Photo Fun threads), but makes no reference to the specific post to which they're replying.  Am I just missing a forum feature when you can somehow determine what post a reply is related to?  

From what I've seen, clicking on Reply in a post does nothing to link your reply with that post.  It just opens a window in which you can type a reply, but the net result is no different than if you used the Post New Comment window at the bottom of each page.  Not a problem with a blog, where most replies are directed toward the originator of the thread, but in a public thread with multiple contributors such as WPF, it can be confusing.

Just thought I'd bring this up, since some of the more generic replies in such threads (e.g. "Nice photo.  How did you do your ground cover?") must be really tough for the intended recipient to address, since no one knows to whom the question is addressed.  If I'm missing a forum feature that would clear all this up, I'd be grateful for any correction.

Joe Atkinson
Modeling Iowa Interstate's 4th Sub, May 2005
https://m.facebook.com/groups/iowainterstate4thsub

https://www.iaisrailfans.org/gallery/4thSub

My MRH blog index

https://instagram.com/iaisfan

Reply 0
DKRickman

DIY threading

I've never found a way to link a reply with a specific post.  As far as I can tell, a reply and a post [on a given thread] are completely identical.  My way of dealing with the issue has been to always try to quote the referenced post, or to direct a comment to a specific member.

Ken Rickman

Danville & Western HO modeler and web historian

http://southern-railway.railfan.net/dw/

Reply 0
Bill Brillinger

Feature?

Maybe the reply feature will work correctly in the next iteration of the MRH forums. The reply feature should automatically be quoting the post you are replying to.

Bill Brillinger

Modeling the BNML in HO Scale, Admin for the RailPro User Group, and owner of Precision Design Co.

Reply 0
rickwade

It is a short coming

I've always got to add in the subject or body to whom I am replying "Michael, yes it is plaster.....," or "Yes, Bob I used 6mm static grass".  It's bothersome and I wish it could link using the "Reply" feature.

Rick

img_4768.jpg 

The Richlawn Railroad Website - Featuring the L&N in HO  / MRH Blog  / MRM #123

Mt. 22: 37- 40

Reply 0
joef

Yes, it's a feature we can add in the updated site

Yes it's a feature we can add in the updated site. The new feature numbers all comments and you can click reply or quote. If you click reply, it adds a note at the top with a link that it's a reply to comment 23, and you can click on the link to go back to comment 23. If you click quote, then when you click the "reply to comment 23" link, it shows a popup of the previous reply content.

We first need to get TrainMasters moved to Amazon, then we will be moving the MRH website to Amazon after learning the ropes with the much simpler TMTV website. Looks like TMTV will be moving in August in-and-around all the summer conventions.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Joe Atkinson IAISfan

Quotes

Same here, Ken and Rick. I always just add quotes manually. I guess I was bringing this up in part to inform others who don't do so that their replies may not be noticed by the intended recipient if they don't manually add a quote or call out the author by name.
Reply 0
Bill Brillinger

Maybe...

in the next version "get email notifications" will work too. aka... "notify me of new posts in this thread".

Bill Brillinger

Modeling the BNML in HO Scale, Admin for the RailPro User Group, and owner of Precision Design Co.

Reply 0
pschmidt700

Thanks, Joe A. and Joe F.

I'm glad you brought this up, Joe A. I like what Ken called it -- DIY Threading.

However, Joe F., the depth of content here more than makes up for a minor shortcoming! But that new feature will be welcome.

Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

2 techniques

Dear Joe (IAIS),

2 techniques for"manual threading"

- as mentioned, 

Quote:

use the quote box

- it may feel old-school, but a clear "Dear ( insert name here )" intro definitely helps...
(flip side, anyone not including a signature block or at least a clear "Regards ( name of poster here )"or similar leaves themselves open to not being replied to, or ambiguous responses. Net'iquette 101)

Happy Modelling,
Aim to Improve,
Prof Klyzlr

Reply 0
arbe

replying to posts

We have an on-line newspaper that allows comment to articles.  After the article one can post a comment and also post a reply to a previous comment.  The replies are indented from the original so one can see that it is a reply to that comment and not a comment on its own.  A feature like this I think would be of great usefulness.

Bob Bochenek

Bob Bochenek   uare_100.jpg 

Chicago Yellowstone and Pacific Railroad     

Reply 0
jwhitten

Another Option

 it may feel old-school, but a clear "Dear ( insert name here )" intro definitely helps...

You could also start out by listing all the people you're not replying to.

But your way probably works too.

 

John

Modeling the South Pennsylvania Railroad ("The Hilltop Route") in its final days of steam. Heavy patronage by the Pennsy and Norfolk & Western. Coal, sand/gravel/minerals, wood, coke, light industry, finished goods, dairy, mail and light passenger service. Interchanges with the PRR, N&W, WM and Montour.
Reply 0
Virginian and Lake Erie

The reply, reply with quote,

The reply, reply with quote, and add comment would be nice then three options are available. It is even more important when many of us have the same or similar names and are posting in the same thread. One day I would be interested to find out how many Robs for example are on here.

Joe F. it sounds like you have more great things lined up for us again.

Rob in Texas

Reply 0
joef

Indenting thread comments

Our site has the indenting capability but it makes the threads get ugly quickly and it also creates a real nightmare if we need to remove a post for any reason because then all the posts underneath it go away. Also, the indenting gets pretty ridiculous once you get beyond about 3 deep because the width available gets so narrow that posting images and the like just looks really ugly - especially on mobile devices like phones.

So we turned thread indenting off and all posts have equal weight and are not sub-threaded. It makes managing posts and moving things around when needed super simple. No, the indenting thing sounds like a good idea, but it gets really messy quick if you have lots of post traffic and people wanting to comment on each other's posts like we have here.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
jwhitten

Please Leave Indenting Turned-Off

Hi Joe    < --- I'm replying to Joe

(Sorry Ralph, Steve, Ozzie, Sam, Mary, Frank, Dennis, Robert, Alice M, Jake, Charlie, Jack, Earnest, Fred, Hernando, Billy-Bob, George, and Eddie)   < --- I'm NOT replying to these guys (See how easy that was!)

 the indenting gets pretty ridiculous once you get beyond about 3 deep  < --- A little quote snippet

Please leave the Indenting off. It does get unwieldy very quickly. Simply having the previous post number, the one being replied to, is more than sufficient in those occasional cases when it is difficult to tell. Plus you can always Right-Click to Open the previous post link and that way see it in a different tab. Then it won't even mess up your current view-- no messy back arrows, just close the tab. 

My 2 Cents

John  < --- I signed my name

Modeling the South Pennsylvania Railroad ("The Hilltop Route") in its final days of steam. Heavy patronage by the Pennsy and Norfolk & Western. Coal, sand/gravel/minerals, wood, coke, light industry, finished goods, dairy, mail and light passenger service. Interchanges with the PRR, N&W, WM and Montour.
Reply 0
Reply