rebeitler

So, has been awhile since I've posted anything. But I recently (within the past year) switched from N to Ho because of failing eyesight, at least up close, and have found something that is throwing me a huge curveball.

Since I last actually used my Lenz USB interface I've upgraded computers at least three times, maybe more. I am using Windows 7 now, and just today found that my interface is a no-go because of "no driver" for the USB interface.

Now after some research today, and many failed attempts by myself, and even my wife who is much more of a computer guru than I, I am ready to throw the Lenz system in the creek and switch to one that at least tries to stay up to date.

So, I have two questions for my friends in the railroad community (since the "tech" types have not been able to resolve this...

1. What DCC system tries to stay up to date, has an interface that allows a seamless conduit to use Decoder Pro, and has instructions that make sense in English?

2. Has anyone actually found a method (driver) to make the interface between Windows 7 and Xpressnet (Lenz) work?

This system used to work fine. Programming decoders in Decoder Pro is something I enjoy-it's easy-and trying to program with bits and hexidecimal stuff is not my cup of tea.

I welcome any and all feedback! Thanks ahead of time.

Reply 0
JC Shall

Lenz Computer Interface

Lenz shows two available interfaces for computers.

The LI-USB:  http://www.lenzusa.com/1newsite1/LI-USB.html

The Li-USB-Ethernet:  http://www.lenzusa.com/1newsite1/Li-USB-Ethernet.html

I'm holding on to my XP computer for the train room as I'm still using the old LI-100F

Reply 0
Rick Sutton

Like Jack said

Often it is best to dedicate computers to a single, important job. Older computers can be had cheap and often it is better to match the computer to the software/hardware than to try to bring the software/hardware to a much newer computer.

Reply 0
Michael Watson

XP is OK

XP is just fine to use in your train room to maintain your DCC system. The only problem is when you connect it to an internet source. It is VERY vulnerable to hackers since Microsoft has stopped updating the operating system and the anti virus software for it. So use it, just do not connect it to the internet !

Michael

Reply 0
joef

Problem with XP

XP is quickly becoming less and less OK for things like DecoderPro. You want to get the latest DecoderPro so you get the latest decoder files for the newest crop of decoders. The domino effect starts to happen then, because to get the latest DecoderPro, you need to get the latest version of the Java runtime, and that throws warnings on XP that it's not recommended because XP is not being updated since April 2014, when Microsoft dropped support on XP. The point is, XP will at some point not even work with Java any longer and then what do you do? You won't be able to upgrade to the latest decoder settings in the newest version of DecoderPro, and then you're sunk. I recently crossed this bridge when I installed my first TCS WOWSound Diesel decoder in a loco. I had to upgrade to the latest DecoderPro to get the decoder files for WOWSound, and I am running XP on my laptop. Warnings started to fly all over the place as I tried to install the latest and greatest. My conclusion from all this is that it's time to start looking for a new cheap laptop that can run the latest version of Windows (Windows 10, which is free) if I want another decade of trouble-free use of DecoderPro. The Java runtime especially complained about being installed on XP, and they warned it might not work properly. Time to think about moving up when those messages start appearing because one of these days, it will no longer work and they will just tell you: "we told you so".

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
JC Shall

Latest Java Runs Fine on XP

It is true that you'll get dire warnings when you try to upgrade to the latest Java while using XP.  However, the latest Java WILL install over XP and runs just fine.  Many folks running JMRI have discovered this.  You may have to download and install it manually initially, but after that (in my experience), further updates are downloaded and installed just as they always were.  How long will this work?  No one really knows.  But on a global basis, XP is far from dead and is still much used.

(still clinging to XP for as long as possible)

Reply 0
ctxmf74

"My conclusion from all this

Quote:

"My conclusion from all this is that it's time to start looking for a new cheap laptop that can run the latest version of Windows (Windows 10, which is free) if I want another decade of trouble-free use of DecoderPro. "

    I see lots of laptops for less than $200 so shouldn't be that hard to find one just for model railroad use.Buy one less loco to pay for it.......DaveB 

Reply 0
joef

Yep, exactly

Quote:
Quote:

"My conclusion from all this is that it's time to start looking for a new cheap laptop that can run the latest version of Windows (Windows 10, which is free) if I want another decade of trouble-free use of DecoderPro. "

    I see lots of laptops for less than $200 so shouldn't be that hard to find one just for model railroad use.Buy one less loco to pay for it.......DaveB 

Yep, that's exactly what I found too, after doing a quick look. It's pretty easy to get an el cheapo lappie for running the latest Windows these days, and that should serve for another 10 years before you need to starting thinking about more hardware upgrades.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
joef

I prefer to hedge my bets

Quote:

It is true that you'll get dire warnings when you try to upgrade to the latest Java while using XP. However, the latest Java WILL install over XP and runs just fine. Many folks running JMRI have discovered this.

True enough. But I prefer to hedge my bets.

The last thing I want to have happen is for DecoderPro on my lappie to suddenly no longer work just as I'm preparing to show the layout to a tour group. All the support guys will tell me if I come crying to them is, "we told you it wasn't supported, sorry" ...

Rather than see how close I can get to the fire without being singed, I prefer to be preemptive, especially when it's only the cost of a loco that's involved ($200-$300). Phoey, I have more locos than I need (who doesn't) and I could *sell* a couple of them to ensure the rest of my fleet is happily being programmed on hardware and software with a long future ahead of it yet.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Greg Williams GregW66

Ubuntu

I have an old PC that I am going to install Ubuntu (Linux) on to try to get Decoder Pro working on. Should happen in the next week so I will post my results. Old machines are available next to nothing. Easy way to make a dedicated system and by easy I mean cheap. I have NO Linux experience so if I can do it anyone can.

At the other end, I don't think you can get a better programming system than an NCE PowerCab coupled with an NCE USB board attached to your computer. Can't comment on Lenz but this is what I have used and it worked flawlessly for me.

Greg Williams
Superintendent - Eastern Canada Division - NMRA
Reply 0
Logger01

Which USB Interface Do You Have?

Which USB interface do you have? If you have the LI-USB you may have to update the firmware. After installing updating the firmware, delete and reinstall the driver. We have several Lenz users in the club running DecoderPro without any problems.

On the other hand, I am with Greg on running DecoderPro and PanelPro on a Linux distribution like Ubuntu, but it does take learning another OS.

Ken K

gSkidder.GIF 

Reply 0
Steven S

You can run Linux from a USB

You can run Linux from a USB flash drive on a Windows-based PC.  In fact I'm typing this while using a distro called Porteus.  I often fire it up if I'm planning to watch some videos (i.e. the new Star Wars trailer ) because it uses up so little of the system resources that videos tend to play back more smoothly on my cheap laptop.

There's a free little program called Yumi that I used to burn the Linux ISO files to the USB (you can't just copy the file over from the file manager.)

http://www.pendrivelinux.com/yumi-multiboot-usb-creator/

Once you've got the distro burned to the flash drive, you hold the appropriate 'F' key while the computer is booting up to get to the boot order menu.  This varies from computer to computer (mine is F12)  Then select the drive for the flash drive.  

 

Steve S

Reply 0
Don Mitchell donm

2 computer approach

Old computer, XP, older Decoder Pro hooked to layout, not connected to the internet.  As long as it handles layout duties other than decoder programming, upgrading isn't needed.

New computer, Windows or Mac updated regularly, Decoder Pro updated regularly, used as primary PC, and hooked to programming track (NCE Power Cab, etc., in my case) when needed.  Handles new decoders as they are added to the fleet, prints car routing if used, etc.

Overall, less hassle.

Don Mitchell

R%20logo.jpg
Read my blog

Reply 0
NDHolmes

A Couple Options

I remember having problems with a friend's layout and his new (at the time) Win 7 x64 machine.  You might try the solution posted here - I think that's how I finally dealt with it.

You're absolutely right - Lenz has all but abandoned the DCC system market.  It's really a shame, because I was a Lenz guy for many years and always felt they were very well built systems.  Plus, their throttle bus was an open specification, which was very important to me in being able to tinker with it.  However, between being increasingly expensive, lacking full-featured wireless throttles (the CVP units are great, but don't support consisting, etc.), and having not been updated or upgraded in around a decade, even I finally gave up.

 I still use my system for testing and programming, and I have an older serial interface (LI101) that I keep around.  That plugs into a USB-> serial converter, that I use to connect to my workshop computer.  I figure the USB to serial converter is essentially disposable if the OS ever stops supporting it, but there will always be some supported converter out there.  The LI100 and LI101 are now hard to find, but I've also built a couple of this circuit, which is essentially an LI100 equivalent.  It works just fine.

With the new layout, I switched to NCE.  It, too, works flawlessly with the USB-> serial converter and JMRI.

Reply 0
Virginian and Lake Erie

As I understand it apple will

As I understand it apple will run decoder pro. Go to apple and forget about the entire buy a new operating system every time Microsoft releases it's next money pit. The only draw back is there are some programs not made for mac

Reply 0
Steven S

....and forget about the

Quote:

....and forget about the entire buy a new operating system every time Microsoft releases it's next money pit.

 

There isn't going to be a Windows 11.  They've announced that instead of coming out with a big new update in a few years and calling it Windows 11, they're just going to do a steady stream of small updates to Windows 10. 

 

Quote:

The only draw back is there are some programs not made for mac

And the fact that you pay considerably more for a Mac.  You can get a decent Wintel laptop for under $300.  The cheapest Mac laptop is $900.   Better to just use Linux to give new life to an old computer.

Steve S

Reply 0
Kevin Rowbotham

Windows 10 is free...

Quote:

There isn't going to be a Windows 11.  They've announced that instead of coming out with a big new update in a few years and calling it Windows 11, they're just going to do a steady stream of small updates to Windows 10. 

Yes, Windows 10 will become the vessel through which Microsoft charges money for that steady stream of small updates... until the end of time as we know it. 

I can't agree with the Linux crowd more, but Linux is still not for everyone.

~Kevin

Appreciating Modeling In All Scales but majoring in HO!

Not everybody likes me, luckily not everybody matters.

Reply 0
Volker

NDHolmes wrote: You're

NDHolmes wrote: You're absolutely right - Lenz has all but abandoned the DCC system market.  It's really a shame, because I was a Lenz guy for many years and always felt they were very well built systems.  Plus, their throttle bus was an open specification, which was very important to me in being able to tinker with it.  However, between being increasingly expensive, lacking full-featured wireless throttles

I think your comment is quite exaggerated. They have updated their system but perhaps not in areas you are interested in: Railcom, Keep Alives, ABC (Automated Braking Control), and the decoders are upgrade regularly.

Their Keep Alive (USP) was the first one as far as I remember and is the only one that lets the locomotive cross a section without any contact. http://lenzusa.com/1newsite1/USP.html 
/> http://www.digital-plus.de/media/USP-HD-1280.mp4

They are offering wireless control via their USB and Ethernet Interface and iPhone with Touchpad software.

I asked Lenz about a conventional wireless throttle when they had just announced their Ethernet interface. They told me they had decided to go this route as they thought the market was not large enough to justify the development of a traditional wireless throttle. Here in Germany other companies provide compatible wireless throttles for the Lenz system e.g. Massoth DIMAX Navigator. It allows consisting of 4 locomotve.

Regards, Volker

Reply 0
JC Shall

Windows 10 is free . . . Not for all

Quote:

Windows 10 is free . . .

Well, not for all.  It's only free for those with Windows 7 or 8.1 on their computers.  Users for Vista, XP or any other flavor have to buy it.  But here's the catch:  your PC has to be able to support Windows 10.  Even if the PC meets the hardware requirements such as processor, video card, memory, etc., that doesn't mean that Windows 10 will install and run on your machine.  Go to the Microsoft site and read the details about it and you'll find that upgrading isn't so simple (or cheap) after all.

I also have other software that will not run under Windows 10, such as Visual Basic 6 and a few other applications.  Then there are the hardware peripherals to consider.  I've been burned before by Microsoft when upgrading operating systems, and will likely go to Linux before ever upgrading Windows again, at least on this train room PC.

Reply 0
joef

Lenz

Lenz was the DCC system I bought back in 1993 because at the time I liked the simple large knobby tethered throttles made by John Mann for the Lenz X-Bus. By 2000, I was interested in going wireless and it appeared to me Lenz was not keeping up technically, so I moved to EasyDCC wireless and was a happy user of that system for 7 years, at which point I upgraded to NCE because I liked their more flexible wireless options and I also felt their built-in double-ended consists were better suited to my needs. Here in 2015, I am a very happy NCE user. After Lenz released the DCC spec for NMRA approval as the DCC track signal standard, they became something of a follower in the DCC market for the most part. Yes, they have a few bright spots like the Gold keep-alive offering, but keep-alive options have proliferated from several DCC vendors - so where are the exciting follow-on keep alive offerings from Lenz? Lenz has never really exploited their product offerings like they could have. They seem to do mostly one-off products that show a spark of great inspiration but then appear to lack a strong vision for how take it to the next level. FWIW, I am still using my two original Lenz boosters that I bought in 1993. They're solid as a rock and just keep on going like the energizer bunny ...

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Volker

I think the Lenz USP is quite

I think the Lenz USP is quite different than other company's Keep Alives. If one needs it is every ones decision.

Lenz diversified in O-scale equipment like locomotives, freight cars, passenger cars, track system including turnouts, and even three HO-scale locomotives.

Looks like their main interest has shifted away from DCC or is devided between the different product lines. Before they followed the requests from the German market in the first place. And here the interest in wireless throttles started much later than in the USA. German model railroads are much more automated than in the USA. Railroads controlled by computer or operating with an automatic block system are two keywords. It is my point of view that these German preferences led to the development of Railcom, and ABC.

Europe and especially Germany are still Lenz' main markets.

It is likely that Lenz doesn't serve all American preferences but to say Lenz has all but abandoned its DCC system is not correct as I see it.

Regards, Volker

Reply 0
joef

The effect is the same

Quote:

I think the Lenz USP is quite different than other company's Keep Alives ...

USP also appears to pick up the DCC signal through blockages, like with their plastic wrap on the rails stunt. But when I last checked, the USP "keep it running without power" duration was a couple seconds at most.

In the latest keep alives I'm testing, I can take the unit off the track and it will keep running for 10+ seconds with sound. Where's Lenz's new-and-updated USP that does that? They did have a product that appeared to offer much longer keep-alive times, but they discontinued the product in 2013. Huh?

Sure, the technology used may be somewhat different and really clever, but at the end of the day, the reason I want to use this feature is the same. It keeps things running regardless of dirty track or dirty wheels or dead spots - and the new super-capacitor keep-alives that last for 10+ seconds (even on sound locos!) seem far more useful than a 1-2 sec USP decoder is.

I'd love to see Lenz take their innovations and really exploit them, but they seem somehow distracted and fail to really run with the great product ideas they get.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
JC Shall

Agreeing with Joe

Quote:

Lenz has never really exploited their product offerings like they could have.

I have to agree with Joe on this.  I'm still a Lenz user, but if I were to buy a system today, it would be NCE.  I have felt somewhat abandoned by Lenz for a number of years now.

When I was studying the DCC systems Lenz was developing a wireless throttle, I believe the LH250.  It looked like the present LH90 with the big throttle knob.  I decided to go with Lenz based on the promise of that wireless throttle.  Within the year, Mr. Lenz abandoned the project, saying that to build a wireless throttle that could be certified in all the countries that he marketed to would price the throttle out of reach.  That was quite a blow to me.  Sure, he later came out with the XPA gizmo that allowed one to use a wireless phone for a throttle, but that just seemed like a clunky kludge to me.  I believe he eventually discontinued that.  They do presently offer the ability to use "smart" phones for throttles, but that doesn't appeal to me personally (I just love that big old knob).

Lenz hasn't come out with a new product that I've found useful for over 10 years now.  But then, as stated earlier, the USA isn't their prime market.

Reply 0
Paulc

Linux is as easy to run as

Linux is as easy to run as any other OS. I have a couple friends i put on it specifically because they are technical newbs, and they will have a lot less trouble with Linux.

... Paul

Reply 0
Volker

JC Shall wrote: Within the

JC Shall wrote: Within the year, Mr. Lenz abandoned the project, saying that to build a wireless throttle that could be certified in all the countries that he marketed to would price the throttle out of reach.

Because of these troubles Lenz has tried to use standards with wireless throttles that allowed worldwide use without much regulatory troubles. First was the DECT telefon standard and now WiFi.

When I look at the American wireless throttles there are not many I would be allowed to use in Germany. Most manufacturers use frequencies not cleared for hobby use in Europe. And even if they use 2.4 GHz they cannot export without adjusting special aspects of the transmitting power and a new certification. I am hoping for RailPro to do just that. Time will tell.

And that is required in both directions.

Lenz has done quite a lot in the DCC sector in the last years but likely not much you would like to see in the USA. But model railroad operations in the USA and Germany are very different with different DCC needs.

Joe is correct, they are distracted by reviving O-scale in Germany.

Regards, Volker

Reply 0
Reply