LKandO

By what measure are articles rated?

  • How useful it is to me
  • How much I enjoyed reading it
  • What I would like to see more of
  • How informative it is
  • other...

As an example: Charlie's coved corners. The article is very informative due its step-by-step nature so I would rate it high in that regards. I am not going to modify my house walls for sake of round corners so I would rate it low in usefulness to me. I always enjoy reading Charlie's articles because of the prose so I would rate it good on the enjoyment scale. Again, I have no need for coved corners so I don't need any more coved corner articles hence a low rating by that measure.

How do I rate Charlie's article?

Sincerely,
Torn

Alan

All the details:  http://www.LKOrailroad.com        Just the highlights:  MRH blog

When I was a kid... no wait, I still do that. HO, 28x32, double deck, 1969, RailPro
nsparent.png 

Reply 0
Ken Glover kfglover

Rating

I think I usually use a combination of usefulness and how much I enjoyed it. I really try not to over think it.

Ken Glover,

HO, Digitrax, Soundtraxx PTB-100, JMRI (LocoBuffer-USB), ProtoThrottle (WiThrottle server)

View My Blog

20Pic(1).jpg

Reply 0
joef

Tom? Alan's evil twin?

Signed Tom? Alan is that your evil twin?

I agree with Ken, let's not overthink this please. Either you'd like to see more articles like this or you wouldn't.

Rate it high if you'd enjoy more articles like this, or low if you wouldn't. That should just about cover it.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Bill Brillinger

T o r n

Joe, That's  T O R N , not Tom

Bill Brillinger

Modeling the BNML in HO Scale, Admin for the RailPro User Group, and owner of Precision Design Co.

Reply 0
Reply