Sean Martin

Back in the "old days", there were many articles in the mrr press describing different roadbed construction methods which would produce superior sound deadening qualities.  Now, with sound locos, many layouts have become very noisy and create a much more dynamic experience for the model railroader.  

It seems to me that going back to having noisy roadbed would be the way to go to complement sound locos and ad a sense of additional reality to our layouts.

What are all your thoughts?

Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

2 schools

Dear Brotha,

While I understand your logic, the "current wisdom" seems to suggest that a quiet, non-resonant roadbed is now _more_ critical then ever, with the growing rate of onboard sound-equipped locos. In short, the sound of a model train physically operating over "drum head" roadbed can easily, uncontrollably, (and noticably "out of scale" in terms of both frequency and amplitude) overpower the effect of a "scale sound" loco sound system.

I know that some modellers like the ethos of "there's no electronics, like _no_ electronics", and point to the fact that metal-wheels-on-metal-rails give a pleasing "clickety-clack" without the need for any onboard sound decoders. (funnily enough, such a "pure" sound generation also has _automatic_ speed, pitch, and doppler effects built-in! ).

If you can find a copy, (and if my memory serves correctly), check out the small "Modelling Track" booklet by Kalmbach. One of the articles covered a modeller's extensive testing of various roadbed materials, and their effect on percieved operational sound. The test methodology may not hold up against, say, a true Pro Audio test such as by Audio Precision or EAW, but it did provide some interesting insights regarding sound and track behaviour...

Happy Modelling,
Aim to Improve,
Prof Klyzlr

PS IIRC, the "gold standard" as suggested by the Kalmback article author, was a free-rolling metal-wheelset-equipped boxcar, on a 3' length of flextrack, sitting on a thick bathtowel...

PPS ask yourself first, are you looking for "the roar of a full scale train" from your not-12"/1' scale models,

or would you rather a "scale sound" which more-closely emulates the impression that the sound is emenating from the "miniature prime mover" itself?

NB try not to see the word "scale" and immediately think
"...oh, so I simply drop a prototype recording by 1/87th the volume, and I've got 'scale sound'..."
(it's both simpler _and_ simultaneously far-more-complex than that ),

However, Trust Your Ears, and you can't go wrong...

 

Reply 0
proto87stores

Oh for a quiet life

The stores is located a coupla hundred yards from busy tracks. We barely notice trains rolling past. The horns are noticeably loud but that's all. The motor sounds and the cars rolling (separate sounds) drop off very rapidly only a short distance away. You almost feel it more through the ground, than hear it. For a train that looks about the right distance for HO, the sound is almost gone. And I never hear a train that's far enough away that it seems "n" scale.

I'm all for making the roadbed as quiet as possible. And even sound deadening inside the car so they don't make that model "rushing" noise as they roll faster.

Andy

Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

plastic boxes make great resonant chambers...

Deae Andy, Yep, plastic boxes with a semi-sealed volume of air inside them make for fantastic little resonant amplifier/chambers. All they need is a little mechanical vibration imparted into them, and they "sing" at their natural harmonic frequency... Some modellers have tried killing two birds with one stone, insofar as adding weight with thin sheet lead, and bonding said sheet-lead to the boxcar and loco-shell walls in an attempt to deaden, or lower the resonant frequency of the shell. Some interesting results, but unfortunately also has the byproduct of getting the extra weight up high, thus making the boxcar less stable. Of course, when modelling subways and their unique acoustic "signature", both roadbed and carbody resonance can be your friend! Happy Modelling, Aim to Improve, Prof Klyzlr
Reply 0
UP MAN

Kinda Like the track noise.

Even with todays sound decoders built into the locos i find that i still like to hear the wheel sets heading down the line. In fact, i find myself turning the volume down in my locos or they drown out the rail sounds. Kinda wierd, spend $300.00 on a sound equiped loco that touts the loudest decoder only to turn it down! lol.

FREE LANCE MODELING THE UNION PACIFIC FROM COLORADO TO COUNCIL BLUFFS IOWA

CLIFF MCKENNEY

ARE WE HAVING FUN YET?

Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

Turning it down

Dear UP,

As a Pro Audio bod, I have to say I'm a little disturbed that some sound-equipped locos are sold/purchased based on "who's loudest". Apart from the fact that I've yet to see a sound-equipped loco put thru a truly rigourous audio test,
(I've got an anechoic chamber and Audio Precision tone-gen/analyser ready and waiting... ),

the power-amp in most decoders will actually have more headroom to "sing" if we do _not_ force it into overload by overloading the source audio signal (IE push the Master CV volume up to max).

Lower distortion and overall amplitude = more "breathing room" when that horn blast really needs to "hit home" and cut thru all other sounds.

Furthur, not pushing the source signal + not pushing the power amp = better chance of getting a clean, undistorted sound out of the little speakers we're obliged to use onboard,

_and_, surprise, by tweaking the EQ (Tsunami) or the frequency content of the sound files themselves (Lok), we can quite effectively compensate for both the lower overall volume (human ears are not as sensitive to extreme High and Low frequency sounds when played at lower volumes, Google "Fletcher-Munson curve"),

and for the anomalies of the speaker/enclosure itself...

As Andy noted, stand trackside and really listen to the passing of a train, the loco sound often drop-off rather more quickly than we might imagine. We can't change the law of physics RE propagation of sound thru air, speed of sound, etc, but we _can_ work them to our advantage...

Happy Modelling,
Aim to Improve,
Prof Klyzlr

PS despite our best efforts, it's critical to realise that "sound" has no concept of "scale".
(Just because the signal, power-amp, and speaker are mounted in a scale model,
does not mean the physics of the soundwaves hitting one's ears change in any way.
It's still full-size, albeit small, soundwaves travelling thru full-size air, to full-sized-ears...)

Reply 0
rickwade

Lowered the volume

I've lowered the volume on my sound locomotives to about 25% of maximum as I find that high volumes get irritating. During open houses when the normal room noise is high I do crank the volume up. Rick

Rick

img_4768.jpg 

The Richlawn Railroad Website - Featuring the L&N in HO  / MRH Blog  / MRM #123

Mt. 22: 37- 40

Reply 0
Jurgen Kleylein

different strokes

I kind of like the track sound at the club.  We handlay right into wooden roadbed, so there is no sound deadening at all on our layout.  I actually think the whooshing sound, especially of plastic wheels, and the whimpy clicking sound at the rail joints on deadened track makes it sound more toylike.  The metal on metal sound is more appealing to me.  It doesn't sound real, it just sounds better, in my opinion.  Having some cars in the train making realistic rolling car sounds would be interesting, but I'm not sure I would want to pay for the sound decoders to pull that off.

Jurgen

HO Deutsche Bundesbahn circa 1970

Visit the HO Sudbury Division at http://sudburydivision.ca/

The preceding message may not conform to NMRA recommended practices.

Reply 0
Ken Glover kfglover

Keeping the sound down...

I have my sound locos volume set in the 25 to 30 percent range. (much like Rick above) My shelf layout is in a tight area and running the locos at default volume does get irritating. Using JMRI to set up my decoders makes it a very simple task.

Ken Glover,

HO, Digitrax, Soundtraxx PTB-100, JMRI (LocoBuffer-USB), ProtoThrottle (WiThrottle server)

View My Blog

20Pic(1).jpg

Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

"rollingstock sound"

Dear Jurgen, Over the past year or so there has been some pretty intense discusion of "rollingstock sound" over on the LayoutSound Yahoogroup. The projects centered around using the Digitraxx Soundbug and Fred Miller's SPJHelper utility as a cheap (less than US$50) digital audio player, with "random occurance", DCC speed-step reactive, and "CAM input triggerable" capability.

Such units could concievably provide various combinations of the following, and many other "rollingstock sounds"

- tight-curve flange squeal
- wheel/railjoint "clickety clack"
- wheel flatspot "thunk"
- random occurance mech-reefer startup/run/shutdown
- Horns as found on RCL units
- triggerable "handbrake"
(get your "brakeman" to have an active audible part of the actual switching ops!)
- etc etc

Happy Modelling,
Aim to Improve,
Prof Klyzlr

Reply 0
arthurhouston

Quiet Trains?

Never heard a quiet train.
Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

Trackspeed VS Throttle position RE audible volume

Dear Art,

...equally, there's plenty of examples where a diesel-electric loco consist heading away from the listener is all but in-audible over the sound of the cars following, once 2-3 cars have passed...
(search "railfan video" on Youtube...

Just one example here


The first consist at 0:17 is indistinguishable by 0:22, only 3x impack-platform car-lengths later,

The 2nd consist's bell first audibly chimes at 0:33,
the whine of the traction motors occurs one second later at 0:34,
and it's all but drowned out by the trailing cars by the time the white tankcar 3 cars back flies by at 0:37


You can hear the railfans upset about something,
but did you actually discern that a 2-loco BNSF consist was coming at you hard and fast from the LH side of frame until 0:37, where you _may_ have heard the diesel horn blast,
just 5 seconds before it appeared in-frame at 0:42,
and then was drowned out by the trailing cars 2x Impack platform cars later at 0:47...),...

 

...and a drifting/pacing steam loco can be darn quiet, until it blows it's whistle...

(


note that 844 is virtually inaudible until it hits "scale HO viewing distance" directly adjacent to the camera at around 2:01, the helper diesel behind is making far more piercing "high pitched" noise,
and both are drowned out by the trailing cars by 2:17...)

Remember, mechies don't refer to the accellerator/throttle as the "noise" or "volume" control without cause...

Happy Modelling,
Aim to Improve,
Prof Klyzlr

Reply 0
DKRickman

Shhhh!

Quote:

Never heard a quiet train.

You might be surprised!  A car rolling by itself on welded rail is nearly silent, especially in the snow.  I have been surprised by cars sneaking up behind me in a hump yard.

Jointed rail would, of course, be a good bit noisier.

Ken Rickman

Danville & Western HO modeler and web historian

http://southern-railway.railfan.net/dw/

Reply 0
slow.track

With welded rail most of what

With welded rail most of what you hear is flat spots on the wheels more so than anything else.

Reply 0
Prof_Klyzlr

Flatspot example

Dear MRHers,

Just because it was mentioned, one of the best YT videos of a live-fire flatspot IMHO,
(and how, what sounds devastatingly loud trackside may be completely inaudible in the cab)...

Happy Modelling,
Aim to Improve,
Prof Klyzlr

Reply 0
Jurgen Kleylein

turning down the volume on the prototype

Modern welded rail mainlines sound much different than old jointed track.  I remember jointed mainline when I was younger and found the noise of the train's wheels slamming over the joints at speed very intimidating if I was less than 50 feet from the rails back then.  Now you just get the singing sound of the wheels on the rail, with the odd flat spot.  It's a lot quieter than it used to be.

Jurgen

HO Deutsche Bundesbahn circa 1970

Visit the HO Sudbury Division at http://sudburydivision.ca/

The preceding message may not conform to NMRA recommended practices.

Reply 0
Williejay

Foam filler

One could try a spray of expanding foam filler taking care not to over fill.

Reply 0
Reply