Sean Martin

I was experimenting using AnyRail 6 trying to design an N scale version of the first Utah Belt layout. Has anyone in this group designed an N scale UB? Would like to see for ideas.

Below are photos of what I worked the other night. . .takes some practice laying track over the image but I am finding consistency with the curves. The curves range from 15" to 18" radius so far and the turnouts align with #7 Atlas Turnouts.

Once I get the hang of it, I'll start from scratch and add more room details, elevations, scenery, structure, etc.  It's been fun so far!

 

0-7-2020.jpg 

0-7-2020.jpg 

 

0-7-2020.jpg 

Reply 0
ctxmf74

an N scale version of the first Utah Belt layout.

   I can't recall what the first Utah belt layout looked like but in general when reducing an HO scale layout plan to N scale one has to stretch some areas to maintain usable aisle widths. As the scale gets smaller the people in the aisles remain the same size.....DaveB

Reply 0
blindog10

As a rule....

When you reduce an HO plan to N you gain little in actual length of the mainline for the reason DaveB mentioned.  Of course the scale distance is nearly doubled, and you can fit more track across a scene, for instance in a yard.  And industries that may have looked a bit small in HO can now be more prototypical looking in size.  It can be an interesting design exercise.

Scott Chatfield

Reply 0
ctxmf74

  "And industries that may

Quote:

"And industries that may have looked a bit small in HO can now be more prototypical looking in size."

Yeah, ideally one would just build the layout in the same footprint but use N scale track and scenery instead of HO scale. This would allow the scenery to be more to scale size and the track plan compression and the curve radius to be more realistic.....DaveB

Reply 0
Reply