Next steps in the learning process.
Up to this point everything I had printed was downloadable content. It allowed me to understand how to take a file, and get it printed with acceptable results from a FFF printer. But I didn't purchase this printer just for that function, I purchased it so that I could design and print my own parts.
The journey so far had been very pleasurable. But I wanted to start moving on to the next step.
While researching printers, I also started to examine what 3D design software was out there.
A little background on me. My degree is in Manufacturing Engineering. I spent 8 years in the field with two different employers primarily in metal removal (machining). I used to program machining and turning centers manually, meaning I did NOT utilize a post processor program to generate my tool paths. When I look at a 3D printer startup and end block in the slicer software, it is quite familiar to me.
When I was starting my career, I had the opportunity to play with Computervision CADDS3, which allowed me to draw my own 3D files in CAD, and then generate my own tool paths. But I never got to actually cut metal with them as the company did not trust the output files that Computervision was generating for the machine tools we were using (for those who may have worked in the field, Kearney and Trecker MM series machining centers, and Monarch turning centers).
In 1989, I got tired of seeing vast swaths of my employer's factory getting outsourced, I transferred into Field Service (my employer is an MP&E supplier to the railroad industry). So for the last 31 years, I have only kept up with developments in manufacturing from the periphery. For all intents and purposes, I am jumping back into CAD (Computer Aided Design) software with very weak base knowledge.
Before purchasing a printer, I read all I could about various software platforms that were available, including Sketchup, TinkerCad, Blender, and others. I started doing sketches in TinkerCad, and was not really happy with the object oriented design. My personal impression was that I would quickly run into the limitations of the TinkerCad program, and have to change platforms anyway. What do I want to design with my printer? Here is the list in order of complexity:
- Open load blocking patterns. First up is what I need to make several open top loads with IH Farmall tractors on it, since I am modeling an IH fictitious factory on my railroad.
- Buildings. Need to create an aluminum reduction facility (the Kaiser Mead works has been my rough pattern), a secondary aluminum processing facility (like Reynolds Aluminum in McCook IL, or Kaiser Trenton near Spokane WA), and a silicon production facility (the Rock Island plant near Wenatchee WA is serving as the pattern).
- Freight Cars. There are a whole host of late steam era freight cars that I want to take a whack at printing, possibly with less detail (think molded on grab irons) than a resin kit. I have a pile of those to build in retirement too.
Both TinkerCad and Fusion 360 are AutoDesk programs. When I read on the MRH forum that I could acquire a Fusion 360 license for hobby use, I immediately signed up. I didn't do a darn thing with it for about 3 months.
But now, I have a printer, and software, so time to get to work. What project would be a good starting point?
Well, I found one on a friends layout. Based on my limited use of TinkerCad, I started looking at the project in terms of simple shapes that would go together. It looked like a good place to start. Here it is.
The IC / ICG, now CN has a bridge over the Kankakee River. My friend wants to replicate a scaled down version of that bridge on his layout. He even did line drawings of what he needed, and as a fill in, had it taped up to the sub-roadbed where the bridge will go. I offered to take a crack at 3D printing this bridge, since I figured the project was within what I was capable of doing. So off I merrily went with the drawings.
Here is the Google Earth snapshot of the bridge in real life:
The model version of the bridge only has four courses of the bridge instead of the five shown, plus the course over the road. He also shortend up on the center to center distances a bit (selective compression) to meet the space available.
Here is a shot of the line art showing how it will sit in the space, and the line drawing I'm working with for the four main courses:
I'm doing this project in AutoDesk Fusion 360. I chose Fusion 360 due to the advanced features of the program, which should meet my needs going forward for every project I do. There is also a wealth of videos on YouTube, and on the AutoDesk web site to help get the new user familiar with the latest version of Fusion 360.
The bridge as drawn is 10" between centers, which is too big for my Prusa Mini. No problem, cut it in half. I designed the inner spine first, and I purposely did NOT put arches on this part as there is actually straight walls behind the appx. 1 real foot facade. Here is the Fusion 360 view:
I printed two halves of this file. One of the BIG nice features of Fusion 360 is it allows me to take the Fusion 360 file directly into Prusa Slicer. Once I had that in the slicer, I specified 15% infill. What does that mean? It means that the center is hollow, with a structual pattern that only fills 15% of the space. It is quite amazing how strong and light this print actually is.
Here is a photo showing both sides glued together.
So far, this project is a success.
- Dimensionally, this thing is spot on. Before I 3D printed this part, I created a drawing from Fusion 360 to a PDF, printed it out actual size, and laid it over the drawing from my friend. It was spot on within the limits of his drawing skills.
- The Prusa Mini has fulfilled all of my expectations of it at this point
- It took me about 4 to 6 hours of learning Fusion 360 to get to this point.
- Shop vernacular got a mild workout to get to this point.
- I glued these two assemblies together with Oatey PVC cement. I couldn't get enough Plastruct cement to the party to get a good joint. I've stress tested the joint with about 5 plus pounds of weight directly over the joint. VERY strong!
- I had to do some light filing on the ends of the part to make them flat. About on par with the level of filing I have to do on a plastic kit to flatten snipped off sprues.
After this step, I was encouraged, and ready to move on to the next phase, which is drawing the facade that goes on the front. More on that in the next blog entry.
Regards,
Jerry