MRH

                   MRH: September 2019

2019-MRH.jpg 

Read online ►

Download & read offline ►

Problems accessing the issue?
Follow these troubleshooting steps ...

Reply 0
jcrellin

no notice

Odd.  I received no email to download the sept issue...  had to really dig to find it.  not on the main page of MRH?

Reply 0
joef

Delayed because of the holiday

Read: https://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/node/37391 The issue was just released, and we like to give it a day or so to bake in before we post it on the front page. So it will go to the front page by this evening.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Photo Bud

Still Haven't Fixed

Peter Vassallo's name, though.

Bud (aka John), The Old Curmudgeon

Fan of Northern Pacific and the Rock Island

Reply 0
joef

Patience

Quote:

Peter Vassallo's name, though.

Patience! We are working through an entire list of corrections that surfaced like busy little bees. Once all those corrections are made and validated, then we have to push Six (count 'em SIX) different fully debugged and tested variants of the magazine along with (in this case) some video updates too.

Until those fixes are in place, we won't be updating the current issue links.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Photo Bud

I'm an Old Curmudgeon!

I don't have to be patient!

j/k - Since you had posted an update without the change, didn't want this one forgotten, that's all. lol

Bud (aka John), The Old Curmudgeon

Fan of Northern Pacific and the Rock Island

Reply 0
joef

Okay, MRH updated

Okay, MRH all updated ... in some cases there's some significant change, so DO download a fresh copy if you're reading the PDF offline.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Ken Rice

Good readin’

Fresh copy downloaded.  Last months issue didn’t tweak my enthusiasm much for some reason, this Sept issue is definitely catching my interest.  Good issue.  Maybe I was just in a lousy mood when I read August, perhaps I should go back and take another look at it...

Reply 0
ACR_Forever

Agreed, another great issue!

Just a nitpick - Switching to "March" on page 154 of the RE version was a tad incongruous - I presume someone just missed that the header wasn't linked to the previous "September" header?   

Anyways, this issue kept my interest right to the end - unusual for me!  Keep up the good work.

Blair Smith 

Reply 0
Reply