railandsail

Yesterday I found many of my Peco turnouts, and and their 'Streamline' versions label their turnouts as 'small radius", medium radius, and large radius. Peco's small radius appears to match the Fleischmann Pro-Track small radius. 

But I also discovered an even smaller radius turnout from Peco. I have a paper template of it, but not an actual turnout itself. It was termed a Peco "Setrack"  ST-240,241 left or right hand turnout. Do they still make such an item?

Are the Fleischmann turnouts DCC compatible??

Brian

1) First Ideas: Help Designing Dbl-Deck Plan in Dedicated Shed
2) Next Idea: Another Interesting Trackplan to Consider
3) Final Plan: Trans-Continental Connector

Reply 0
railandsail

Good Video on DCC Turnouts

Just happened across this video while looking for info on turnout DCC compatibility.

Some of the sites I visited seem to say the frogs on these Fleischmann units are isolated.

Reply 0
JAMES DEWAR

Fleischmann & DCC

Fleischmann was very early into the digital train control market with their FMZ system (not compatible with DCC) which was introduced in 1986 so all their track works happily with whatever control system you use.

The Fleischmann 6170 and 6171 short turnouts have plastic frogs whereas the 6178 and 6179 long points have a moving metal frog.

Peco makes the ST-240 and ST-241 along with a complete range of trackwork.

All the Peco is DCC compatible, straight out of the packet, just observe normal wiring practices.

Reply 0
highway70

From

PECO ST vs SL track   From   http://www.modelrailwayforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=949

Setrack is fixed sections of track in both straight and curved rail sections.
Setrack points are only produced in Insulated frog (self isolating) type.
Assuming "OO" track, the spacing between adjacent tracks is different by 17mm.
Setrack is at 67mm track centre to centre while Streamline is at 50mm spacing and is a more prototypical spacing.
Setrack in "OO" is sold with Code 100 rail only.

 

PECO  track catalog 

http://www.peco-uk.com/prodtype.asp?strParents=&CAT_ID=3309&numRecordPosition=1

Reply 0
railandsail

Confused a bit

Since the 'streamline track' is most often the one utilized for HO layouts, does that mean the 'set track' at a 17mm different spacing is not useable?

Is there a site where I  might find paper templates for Fleischmann turnouts,...something like that for the Peco

Reply 0
Oztrainz

Set track points vs stream line

Hi Brian and all 

First to clear up some issues - the code 100 SetTrack turnouts are compatible with Code 100 Streamline turnouts and Code 100 flextrack. The ST240/ST241 are still made and yes I've used them recently on my Corrimal layout. BUT - the because these are sharper and swing wider than the Streamline turnouts the track spacing with 2 of them facing each other is 67mm rather than the 50mm for Streamline turnouts.

The difference between a short Streamline (left) and and SetTrack turnouts (right) is readily apparent in the next photo:

1230258a.jpg The two SetTrack turnouts here have been carefully modified to get the track spacing down to 55 mm. The details of how we did it and the design and building of this module have yet to appear in my Corrimal Colliery Incline thread. 

First some info on Peco collated from the Peco catalogue webpages with effective radius and divergence (in degrees out of 360 for a circle) The E prefix in front of the number is the Electrofrog catalog number. No E = Insulfrog catalog number. 

For Code 100 rail 

Set track radius #2 (ST240-ST242) 438mm (17 1/4")  Insulfrog only. 22 1/2 degrees

Short radius (SL91/SLE91-SL92/SLE92) 610mm (24") 12 degrees 

Medium radius SL95/SLE95-SL96/SLE96 914mm (36") 12 degrees

Long radius (SL88/SLE88-SL89/SLE89 1584mm (60") 12 degrees

Peco Set Track Curve Radius

R1 - 371mm (14 5/8")

R2 - 438mm (17 1/4")

R3 - 505mm (19 7/8")

R4 - 571mm (22 1/2")

For Code 83 (US profile)

#5 - (SL8351/SLE8351/SL8352/SLE8352) 660mm 26"  11.4 degrees 

#6 - (SL8361/SLE8361-SL8362/SLE8362) 1092 (43") 9.5 degrees

#8 -  (SL8381/SLE8381-SL8382/SLE8382) 1702mm (67") 7.15 degrees 

Fleischmann

For Fleischmann track geometry, the best information I have found so far is at   https://www.fleischmann.de/doc/an/2/de/BA_6170_200911.pdf See Diagrams 6 and 7. Track spacing is dependent on which type of track and which turnouts are used. To get printout like the Peco templates, perhaps create a "small layout" of individual turnouts and then do a 1:1 scale printout using one of the track planning software packages that has Fleischmann trackage loaded as one of their track options?

I hope that this gives you some usable information, 

Regards,

John Garaty

Unanderra in oz

Read my Blog

Reply 0
ctxmf74

"perhaps create a "small

Quote:

"perhaps create a "small layout" of individual turnouts and then do a 1:1 scale printout using one of the track planning software packages that has Fleischmann trackage loaded as one of their track options?"

That could give the geometry but if I was considering them I'd find a place to buy one. This would firstly make sure they are actually available in the US at reasonable cost and time span, and secondly give me a chance to see how they feel in person. The geometry wouldn't matter if I didn't like the feel of them......DaveB 

Reply 0
Oztrainz

Fleischmann in the US - Easy

Hi DaveB

If you or anyone else is serious - 30 seconds worth of search gives   https://www.reynaulds.com/catalog/dept_704.aspx I'm sure that there are other stores in the US that import European railway stuff. Prices are indicated but I'm not going to load up a virtual shopping cart to test availability. This is just the first retailer that I found. 

Regards,

John Garaty

Unanderra in oz

Read my Blog

Reply 0
railandsail

Making Fleischmann Turnouts Work

Over the past few months I have played around with some of these very nice Fleischmann tourouts I have. Most recently I have been running individual trucks and some freight cars thru them (manually by pushing).

In some of the tighter radius turnouts I have noticed a little less drop of the wheels into the somewhat deep flangeways, but because these flangeways are so wide in the area of the frog, there is still a noticable drop of the wheels into the 'depths'. I believe it would be possible to add some shims to the 'wing rails' in the frog area to decrease the width of the flangeway and allow the wheel to remain at rail height thru most of its travel thru the frog

%20rails.jpg 

0area(1).jpg 

 

While this would be an interesting challenge to carry off, I've decided to sell off these Fleischmann turnouts to a Euro train enthusiast , or trade them for some Peco's.

Reply 0
railandsail

Set Track & Streamline Pecos

Hi John Garaty and all,

You seem to be quite knowledgeable about, and have worked with, both the 'set track' and 'streamline' Peco turnouts.  So a couple of quick questions initially:

1) Have you found there is any more of a problem (wiring, etc) to utilizing the Set Track Pecos in DCC operation that utilizing the Insulafrog Pecos in DCC operation?

2) I just noticed what appears to be 2 'U' shaped objects (black shapes) wedged between the rails in that photo just above. Are those some sort of current/contact 'enhancers' ?
And if this is the case, it seems odd they would be inserted in this direction??
 

 

 

 

Reply 0
Oztrainz

Answers 1 and 2

Hi Brian,

  1. A Set Track turnout is an Insulfrog turnout, just with a tighter radius and a different track geometry. It behaves electrically like an Insulfrog turnout. Provided you follow the installation instructions with either plastic railjoiners or an isolating cut on BOTH rails heading away from the frog, then you should have no problems with wheels electrically bridging the frog area. See NO FROG SURGERY REQUIRED below, copied but modified from elsewhere on here. This applies to BOTH DCC or non-DCC usage.
  2. That turnout in the photo is a Fleischmann  Profi-track turnout with "plastic ballast" pre-installed. The black clips effectively "hot wire" the blades and convert the turnout to a non-route selective turnout. With those clips removed the turnout becomes route-selective with the non-selected route being electrically dead downstream of the blade. See the diagram at the top of the second page at  https://www.fleischmann.de/doc/an/2/de/BA_6170_200911.pdf   

No frog surgery or modification required

The Peco wiring instructions for Insulfrog turnouts included with the turnouts were available online at  https://www.peco-uk.com/imageselector/Files/Instruction%20sheets/HO-OO%20Insulfrog%20Turnouts.pdf but it looks like the Peco website is being re-worked and this link is no longer valid. 

The reason for the variation in insulating block width is that Peco changed their Insulfrog design some years ago to reduce the amount of insulated track in their turnouts. This was done to improve running characteristics for short wheelbase  0-4-0 and 0-6-0 steam locomotives more commonly used in the UK. Any turnouts with the larger insulating block and plastic frogs are of the oldest design. 

The bold emphasis is mine, but the key point from the Peco instruction sheet is 

Quote:

Turnouts and Crossings since they are electrically self-isolating and ready for use. However, some incorrectly shaped metal wheels can cause a short-circuit when crossing an Insulfrog due to the wide tread of the wheel touching both frog rails at the same time. This occurs when a back feed takes place in a continuous loop. To overcome it insert a Peco Insulating Rail Joiner next to the frog rail of the track forming the loop (3). The golden rule of two-rail electrification is to ensure that current is fed to the track from the toe end of any turnout(s).

If you have the track down and ballasted already, then the option of using the insulating rail joiners is off the table. But you can replicate this by gapping the track on the two frog rails away from the frog area. This is a far easier fix than "frog surgery". It also has the advantage that it is done on straight rail and can be done far enough away from the frog that you don't have to worry about your thin Dremel cut-off wheel snagging an adjacent rail by accident while cutting. 

It doesn't matter whether you are running DCC or DC. As shown in the photo below, gapping these 2 rails ensures that you can't have a short-circuit path in the frog area.

How this works:  

Peco Insuffrog turnouts ONLY power the route the turnout is set for. The other track is electrically dead if the turnout is fed from the toe of the turnout. If something gets across the insulation pieces then frog rail on the other route feeds via the wheel and you get a short circuit. The other route frog rail is being powered by the feeders on that other route NOT by the turnout. This is where the short-circuit occurs. By gapping both frog rails you ensure that the other route cannot backfeed the frog area from the route that is not set.. It doesn't matter if both frog rails are different "polarity" while wheels bridge the insulating pieces, because there is no current path across the track gap to short circuit on the 'wrong rail" on the other route. On the route that is not set there is also nothing to bridge across that track gap.If both frog rails are gapped and you have correctly wired feeders.

For the route that is set:

  • power through the turnout up to the frog gap cut is being provided by feeders at the toe of the turnout and the turnout blade itself
  • power beyond the frog gap cut is being provided by under-track feeders
  • power to the frog area to the other route is isolated at the turnout frog by the Insulfrog design.
  • power to the frog area from the track feeders on the route that is not set is isolated by the gap in the frog rail for the route that is not set. 

With properly coned wheels it should be impossible to bridge over the insulating blocks as designed. BUT some larger steam locomotives and some early smaller fixed-wheelbase diesels had "blind drivers" that had a flat profile and were fitted with un-flanged wheels.  This allowed these intermediate wheels to handle tight curves by sliding sideways on the railhead without having to provide sideways slop in drive-rods and axlebox bearings of a model that were in the prototype design. Blind drivers are also a trick that some manufacturers have used that allows us to bend our model trains around scale-dimensioned curves many times tighter than than the prototype was designed to handle. Please check that your most persistent "culprits" are not fitted fitted with blind drivers. Even if they are so fitted, gapping the frog rails at each turnout should fix the shorting problem, as shown below in the red boxes. Those nickel-silver track joiners should be isolating track joiners. Then there is no reason to do any frog modification.

froga(1).jpg 

But to be really sure, you might like to move the location of the missing isolation gaps shown in the above photos to a distance from the frog that is longer that the length of your longest locomotive. This ensures that any single electrically conductive locomotive unit or wagon cannot bridge across the insulation..It also make sure that only 2 axles of any really short-wheelbase locomotive can be isolated at once and reduces the chances of a short wheelbase loco stalling near the frog area.(Note: stalling is a different problem that needs to be addressed differently than any short circuit problems)   

If you want to make both blades simultaneously electrically live by "hot-wiring the blades under the turnout, then isolate all 4 rails heading away from the turnout. Just like you would have to do on an all-metal hand-laid turnout. for both DC or DCC to prevent shorting at the turnout.. 

Later Additional comment - the current design of the frog area minimises the dead area of the Insulfrog (both Set-Track and Streamline) turnout to maximise a locomotive's electrical performance when passing through the turnout. The requirement to isolate both frog rails to prevent electrical shorting is far easier to achieve than the requirement to install additional switches to switch the frog polarity on any live-frog turnout. Either 2 plastic rail joiners or 2 small cuts with a razor saw or thin Dremel cut-off wheel will fix your problems with no modifications to the frog area being required.

That ought to do for this post. 

Regards,

John Garaty

Unanderra in oz

Read my Blog

Reply 0
railandsail

Thanks John

I was just rereading this subject thread, and wanted to thank John for his very complete poasting.
 

Reply 0
railandsail

Improving Peco Curved Turnouts

I ran across this video on improving the Peco curved (I term them dbl-curved) turnouts. Add a shim to the guard rail to help with transit thru the frog.

Long winded, but good visual  

 

 

Reply 0
railandsail

'Hot Wiring' the Point Rails and the Closure Rails

@John Garaty
 

I've been doing some experiments on shimming the guard rails of my MANY Peco insulafrog turnouts. I set up a couple of test tracks to ass which size/type Pecos I needed to consider adding shims to. I've been using a number of my steam engines with multiple in-line drivers and a couple of steamers with wide/larger flange wheels. I've experienced a number of frog-picking derailments but no shorting in the area of the frogs.


Concurrently I have been 'cleaning up' and detailing some of those turnouts I obtained used as opposed to the new ones I have. While doing this experimenting I did see some hints that those little tabs on the point rails can experience problems with electrical contact. And of course the electrification of these 'point rails' is needed to eventually power the 'closure rails' next in line. Joe F has commented on the disruptive long-term capability of these little point rail tabs to continue to work effectively.
 

So my thought drifted back to how to best add a substitute connection for thos little tabs, AND how to best connect those point rails to the closer rails??
 

I thought I remembered a long V-shaped springy piece of phosphor-bronce wire being inserted between the rails, ….but so far I have not found that reference. The closest example I have found are those mini wire clips we found on those flesichmann turnouts we discussed above.
 

I would like to go forward with modifying all my Pecos while I am inspecting each one before installing them on my layout. How might I best address this desire to ensure long term viability of this point & closure rail connectivity,....and preferable/maybe without soldering??

Reply 0
Oztrainz

Long reply - turnout refurbishment Part A

Hi Brian,

A couple of questions first - 

  • Is it always the same locomotive(s) that is doing the frog-picking? 
  • What radius Peco turnouts are you testing? (24" Small/ 36" Medium/ 60" Large  
  • On which handed turnout does the frog-picking occur? (left-hand diverge/right-hand diverge/no difference??) 
  • Which way is the turnout set (straight or diverge?)
  • which way is the locomotive traversing the turnout from single track toe end or coming in off one of the two tail tracks
  • Which way is the locomotive facing (smokebox or tender first?)  
  • Which wheels on these locomotives are picking the frog? (front bogie leading or trailing axle, leading power unit leading or trailing? rear power unit, leading or trailing, rear bogie leading or trailing axle?

You mentioned a test track:

  • What is the track geometry leading into the turnout under refurbishment?
  • Are you using straight or curved track leading to or from the turnout under refurbishment? 
  • Are there any track kinks at the track joiners leading into the turnout under refurbishment?
  • Where is the power feed for your test track? It should be on the single track approach to the turnout (the toe end of the turnout) 
  • Are you using metal track joiners to all six rails?  Your previous post seems to suggest this.
  • Are you using graphite on the the rails on the turnout and the other trackage in the test track? If not, why not?
  • Could you put up a photo of your test track please? This will make discussing what goes where and why stuff happens where on the test track so much easier.

Before you go shimming a whole flock of Peco turnouts that might not necessarily need it, gather the information for 3 unmodified turnouts of each hand for the first group of questions above and bring the answers back here.

It might be that something "hinky" with either specific locomotive(s)  or the way you have you test track set up that causes the frog picking rather than the turnout design. Just because something "falls off" the rails don't blame the turnout out of hand.

If you have one of 3 turnouts that has same wheels derail at the same location multiple times  then it might be the turnout. If you have the same loco derail the same wheels at the same location on all 3 turnouts then the problem is most likely in the design limitations/set-up of that particular locomotive.    

I'll cover the powering the closure rails and some initial turnout refurbishment suggestions next 

See I told you it was going to be a long reply, and we aren't even 1/2 done yet, 

Regards,

John Garaty

Unanderra in oz

Read my Blog

Reply 0
railandsail

Hi John,Sorry I mislead you

Hi John,

Sorry I mislead you with that intro of mine about the 'testing' I was doing. That testing was more specificity dealing with shim thicknesses as I was talking about testing on another newer subject thread.

Looking for Max Shim Thickness for Peco 100 Guard Rails
https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/looking-for-max-shim-thickness-for-peco-100-guard-rails-12212269

https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/looking-for-max-shim-thickness-for-peco-100-guard-rails-12212269

So if you don't mind lets move the first part of your reply over there??

 

I also think this other subject thread is a better place to discuss the electric question I had for you,...rather than this older one that had fleischmann switches involved with it.??
https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/peco-switches-head-is-spinning-12214085

 




 

Reply 0
Reply