SPSHASTAROUTE

Hi Y'all

I decided to quit procrastinating and start a blog.  I'll probably post mainly about my main interest which is modeling prototype freight cars, but for my first post I figured I would introduce myself and my layout.

About me:  I live in the Nashville TN area.  I have a lovely wife and son.  I'm self-employed as a cabinetmaker.  My other interests are deer hunting and bass tournaments.  This is my fourth layout (second layout that wasn't sectional track on a sheet of plywood).

About my layout:  I model the SP Shasta route in the 1980's HO scale.  The area I model is from uptown Dunsmuir, CA to Grass Lake, CA.  My layout is in the basement of our home and is about 24x14 with a helix in it's own space.  The layout is triple decked point-to-point(sort of) with staging.  Benchwork is 1x4 grid on 16" centers.  Track is mostly Atlas code83 laid on masonite spline ala Joef.  There is Atlas code 100 in staging and hidden tracks and some Microengineering code 70 on spurs.  Turnouts are mostly walthers #6 & #8 code 83.  Minimum radius is 33" with most 48" or more.  I use Digitrax Super Chief Radio for command.

Why I model the SP and the Shasta Route:  Well I guess it started when I was a kid with that first trainset, which was a Lionel BTW.  I grew up on the coast in Northern California at the northern end of the Northwestern Pacific line.  All I knew was SP.  I can remember seeing lashups of SD9's leaving Eureka for points south and the local SW1500 peddling cars to mills in the area (this is around circa 1978-1982).  About the only place we went as a family where trains were was to visit relatives in Santa Rosa, Ca which was served by the NWP and the same SD9's and switchers, etc.  The exception to this was when our family would go up to the Klamath Basin in southern Oregon every fall to camp and duck hunt.  We would head east over the coast range and drop into Redding, CA where we would intercept SP's I-5 corridor mainline from LA to Portland, OR.  There the trains were longer, faster, and more frequent.  This made an impression on me as a young boy.  Pacing alongside a long drag freight with 5 big turbocharged SD's blasting up the Sacramento river was more fascinating to me than the mundane local freight plodding along worn out rail back home.  Then there were the duck marshes we hunted, which were right alongside the SP main before it got to Klamath Falls.  I had fun hunting, but also got to watch a parade of freights all day, it seemed like one after another.  Then there is the scenery on the Shasta Route.  It varies from low-elevation ponderosa and fir forests to high desert, with everything in between, and then back to forest again.  And all this in less than 30 rail miles!  This is due to microclimates, which are more prevalent out west than here in Tennessee.  Here the trees are the same, the humidity is the same, and the terrain is different, but similar enough.  The microclimates on the shasta route are heavily influenced by the volcano Mount Shasta itself.  The mountain casts a huge rain shadow over the north and east quadrants near the mountain.  This is where the Shasta Route skirts right at Shasta's base.  Sage brush and juniper trees predominate here, while 20 miles westbound (geographically south) is forested.  This microclimate phenomenon also exists on Joe Fugates Coos Bay branch.  Notice how the scenery changes as the line leaves the coast and heads for Roseburg.

Ok, on to the pictures:

008.JPG 

We'll start here.  This view shows the three decks of my layout.  You will see the staging yard on the lowest level of the peninsula on the left.  On the right you will see Dunsmuir on the low deck, the Sacramento canyon on the middle deck, and the Dry Canyon Viaduct and Grass Lake on the upper deck and far wall.  Say a train leaves staging (left), travels around the curve behind the camera, and pulls up to the depot at dunsmuir (right).  All trains stop at Dunsmuir, as they do on the prototype, to change crews and add/remove any helpers.  With a fresh crew the train leaves Dunsmuir eastbound and begins climbing the grade up out of the Sacramento canyon and on to the summit at Grass Lake.  On my layout the train would leave Dunsmuir (lower right) and around that curve and along the far wall to the left and into the lower level of the helix. The train would climb three revs. and exit the helix via a turnout to the Sacramento canyon deck (middle deck).  After the helix it would emerge heading left-to-right along the far wall and towards the camera as this train my brother's running is doing.  It would then negotiate the horseshoe curve at Cantara (behind the camera) and begin climbing along the canyon wall represented by the middle deck on the left.  The upper deck on the left is Weed, CA on the Siskyou line branch of my layout. 

004.JPG 

here is the opposite view of the previous picture.  Now the camera is where my brother was, and you can see the transition from staging to Dunsmuir on the low deck, Cantara on the middle deck, and the upper deck, which we'll get to later.  Here a heavy lumber drag is negotiating the 2.2% grade descending to the river crossing at Cantara, where it will reduce to a 1.2% grade. 

007.JPG 

Here is a blurry shot of two swing helpers crossing the bridge at Cantara.  The bridge, abutments and tower were scratchbuilt.  This scene lacks foreground detail and water in the river.

020.JPG 

In this shot we see the WCEUM grinding up the grade rounding the horseshoe known as Sawmill Curve on the prototype.  This is the blob on the end of the peninsula as seen in the previous photos.  The basic track arrangement here is actually fairly faithful to the prototype though drastically compressed.  There is a horseshoe curve back at Cantatra, and another here at Sawmill Curve.  This is known and the Cantara Loops on the prototype.  BTW.  This train had 61 cars and 6 locos counting swing helpers.  It was the longest train I've attempted to run on my layout!  You can see the rear cars of the train on the middle deck across the aisle and several inches lower.

028.JPG 

In this picture the train has rounded Sawmill Curve, is passing through Mott on the left, and through Mt. Shasta City on the right.  We are now on the other side of the peninsula.  The lead locos have entered the helix at the 6th rev. and are going up to Black Butte which is visible on the top deck to the right.

032.JPG 

Here the WCEUM is passing through the yard at south Black Butte.  The head of the train is out of the frame to the left.  The grade has basically leveled off here, and we have reached the upper deck.

034.JPG 

Here is the head end of the WCEUM passing the wye at Black Butte.  The wye is the beginning of the Siskyou line, which is the old original mainline to Oregon.  The train here will pass behind the stump of the peninsula and emerge back on the other side.  This creates some difficulty in operations as the engineer has to walk around the peninsula to regain his train.

 

Here the WCEUM has passed the wye and rounded the curve.  It is stepping out onto the Dry Canyon Viaduct.  I recently finished this scene.  The prototype bridge would scale to about 11' long in HO.  My bridge is 5' long and slightly shorter than the prototype, but still impressive, capturing the feel of the location.  The bridge was kitbashed and scratchbuilt from Microengineering tall steel viaduct towers.  The decking was scratchbuilt.  Don't ask me how long this took!

 

Here is an Intermodal drifting downgrade towards the Viaduct around the corner.  The area represented here is Andesite/Upper Devil's Garden.

043.JPG 

The next scene is known as Cougar.  Here is the backdrop painting of the line's namesake mountain.  I painted the mountain using the photocopy at the upper left.  It is from the book "Southern Pacific's Oregon Division".  I'm quite pleased with how the painting turned out, especially since I've never painted anything before.  If I can do it, you can do it.  This scene needs about 100 trees and lots of sagebrush etc to finish it.

045.JPG 

Well, we've reached the summit at Grass Lake.  Here a hotshot intermodal out of Eugene begins the long decent to Dunsmuir.  I know the era is off, but I had the equipment, so what the hell.  My cloud painting is not as good as my mountain painting IMO.  This train has just emerged from the top of the helix, which is beyond those trees to the left.  This scene needs a boatload of furnace filter trees and some grass in Grass Lake.

035.JPG 

And finally here is the helix.  There are ten revolutions spaced about 5 inches apart.  Each rev. has about 19 feet of track (single track).  On the bottom is the track coming from Dunsmuir.  The Dunsmuir siding extends into the helix through the second revolution where it becoms single track via a curved turnout.  The middle deck Sacramento canyon level exits the helix on the third rev. via a turnout.  At the 6th rev. the middle deck rejoins the helix at Mt. Shasta City.  The Siskyou line splits off on the seventh rev.  This is the lower of the plexiglass encased tracks going off to the right.  The Siskyou line then heads through hidden trackage to the far side of the peninsula where it emerges onto the third deck (peninsula) at Weed, CA.  There will be a large lumber mill complex here eventually.  Then it rounds the blob and winds it's way up to the wye at Black Butte.  At the ninth rev. the single track splits via curved turnout to two tracks.  These two tracks then split again becoming Grass Lake and siding, and Black Butte and siding.  Black butte is the outermost and it begins to flatten out while Grass lake climbs one more rev. to reach the summit.  Black butte can be seen here as the top plexiglass spoke with the string of boxcars in it.  The helix can acommodate well powered trains of up to 35 cars without problems.  Longer trains require mid-train swing helpers to keep the train from stringlining.  I'm still working out the best way to operate helpers reliably, but most trips are uneventful.  For a while I had no guardrails on the inside of the helix, and this cost me some very precious scratchbuilt cars that came to their demise on the concrete floor far below!

One thing I don't like with my arrangement is how all trains must pass through Dunsmuir twice.  This is because an eastbound out of Dunsmuir that travels to Grass Lake via the Sac. canyon, Mott, Black Butte, etc. has to then go back down the helix to the bottom and back through Dunsmuir.  The same for a westbound only backward.  It leaves Klamath Falls (or Medford if it is a Siskyou freight) which is actually staging which means it goes through Dunsmuir then into the helix to the top, and then back down to Dunsmuir again.  I don't like it, but I live with it.

What would I do differently?  Lots of things, of course!   I would build a smaller layout with less than three decks!  I would try to have two staging yards.  I would have a smaller helix with a gentler grade.  Mine is about 3.8% which really taxes long freights.  I would also hand lay my turnouts ala Joe Fugate's method, and use more Microengineering flextrack.  My main interest in the hobby is building prototype rolling stock and locos.  I really enjoy heavy kitbashing and scratchbuilding.  About 25% of my fleet is at least custom painted and decaled, with most of those being heavily modified or made from styrene and parts.  working on the layout and keeping it running cuts into too much of my modeling time.  To me, my layout exists as a place to run my equipment.  Don't get me wrong, I like having a big layout.  I just wouldn't do it that big again.

I hope you've enjoyed the tour of the Shasta Route.

Mike Lozensky

 

 

Mike Lozensky

Moder Railroader   Railroad Modeler

Reply 0
kcsphil1

I did indeed enjoy it

and it looks like you are off to a great start.  I think your preliminary scenary captures the prototype area really well, and even thouhg it is white at the moment, it definitely helps the Ol' Minds Eye figure out what's to come.

For your next assignment (!) might I request a treatise on the fine bridge you showed us?

Philip H. Chief Everything Officer Baton Rouge Southern Railroad, Mount Rainier Div.

"You can't just "Field of Dreams" it... not matter how James Earl Jones your voice is..." ~ my wife

My Blog Index

Reply 0
ChrisNH

Great stuff

Thanks for the commentaty.. lots of insight here.

I found this

Quote:

What would I do differently?  Lots of things, of course!   I would build a smaller layout with less than three decks!

To be a recurring theme.. much like learning from layout owners who say they would build with "bigger aisles" I have over the last year been struck by how many have down sized or claim they would down size were they to redo it. Its part of the reason I am transitioning my design ideas to a smaller layout in a larger scale.

Thanks!

Chris

“If you carry your childhood with you, you never become older.”           My modest progress Blog

Reply 0
Thommo

Wow, it really is BIG! But

Wow, it really is BIG! But impressive.

Hope you finish it soon.

The Railway Enthusiasts Society "Stacion", Rijeka - Croatia • http://www.stacion.hr

Reply 0
caboose14

Very Impressive

Mike,

Enjoyed your layout tour very much. I think you have really captured the feel of the prototype in your scenes so far.  It looks like the layout will have a very nice finished look to it as well. In a way, I really hate seeing these layouts with nice long trains and mainline runs. It's the big thing I miss with my current smaller switching layout.

Great Job! Will be looking forward to seeing updates from time to time.

Kevin Klettke CEO, Washington Northern Railroad
ogosmall.jpg 
wnrr@comcast.net
http://wnrr.net

Reply 0
ratled

Nice job Mike

You got this up fast.  Glad to see even more of the layout!  Your talents show through well.  Keep us posted with layout progress as well as your fine rolling stock.   Do you have op sessions?    

Steve

Reply 0
rickwade

Your layout

Mike,

A few comments:

The long trestle - WOW!

The mountain backdrop you painted - DOUBLE WOW!!

The layout in general - TRIPLE WOW!!!

I'd love to see more picutures from different angles of your trestle and mountains.

Your comments on what you would do different is very helpful, as I am currently deciding single, double, or double (mushroom) design.

Thanks for sharring!

Rick

Rick

img_4768.jpg 

The Richlawn Railroad Website - Featuring the L&N in HO  / MRH Blog  / MRM #123

Mt. 22: 37- 40

Reply 0
Beaver11

 Mike,   Great job!  I

Mike,

Great job!  I understand well your design choices and constraints.  I spent a couple of years attempting to design for the same territory (Dunsmuir-Grass Lake) for a dream retirement basement-filler.  You've done a good job, even more so with the space available.  I look forward to future postings as you continue to flesh out scenery and operate the line.  Super job!

Beaver Bill

Reply 0
Tom Haag

Cool but...

Very interesting railroad and it does seem to capture that Shaste look.

However how really useful (other than to extend the mainline run) is it to have some of the railroad (not just staging) at shin height?  I know that I did not seem to pay that much attention to my trains when they ran at waist height much less below that. 

My thoughts at least. Anyhow very impressive modeling and engineering!

Reply 0
Benny

Very Nice Mammoth! :D  It's a

Very Nice Mammoth! :D  It's a beauty!

I don't think you would have been able to capture the feeling you have achieved going smaller - unless it was N scale...and even then.

--------------------------------------------------------

Benny's Index or Somewhere Chasing Rabbits

Reply 0
SPSHASTAROUTE

Thanks for all the comments!

Hi guys.

I'm blown away by all your comments and praise.  I'll endeavour to answer the various questions asked.  To Steve.  Nice to hear from you again.  Have you completed the bulkheads?  You asked if I have op sessions.  No, but I am not opposed to them if anyone within range is interested.  My brother was just here for a visit, and when he told me about coming out around Christmas I went into overdrive to get the layout running and some more scenery in place.  At that time I hadn't run a train in at least two years.  I had gotten into the rut of working on the layout and modeling only around the winter months.  Come spring I would just get too busy with other things and before I knew it 6 or 7 months had gone by.  When I would finally get back down there it would take a Saturday or so to clean up, reorganize, and try to remember where I left off.  The main reason I couldn't run trains was because the two bridges were under construction.  Even when they were done I didn't want to plant them till the background scenery was mostly in place.  My new goals are: 1.  to spend at least a couple hours every week in the train room, even in the "off season".  2.  Try to run a train or two at least once a week to keep the track clean and everything in working order.  3.  to work on small sections at a time, especially scenery, which can create a real mess.  You may have noticed that the scenery on the uppermost decks is more complete and gets less so as you descend.  That is so scenery mess doesn't get on finished scenery on the deck beneath.

I hear you Tom.  That lower deck is really low!  Here is the story behind that.  I agonized about doing it when I was working on the trackplan.  What influenced me to go ahead and do it was an article on Bob Rivard's Soo Line layout.  He's got a huge layout with multiple decks, nooks and crannies.  According to the article, and folks I knew back in St Paul who would actually saw it in person, some scenes could only be accessed by shimmying, crawling, and contorting!  But he did fit in all he wanted.  I wasn't going to get that drastic!  If you look at my layout, really only the Dunsmuir scene (about 27 feet of track) is that low.  The rest is staging.  One thing I worked really hard at when designing was the viewing angles.  In one sense, you've got to keep the deck separation right so you can see to the backdrop.  In another sense is the look and feel of the prototype.  At Dunsmuir, for instance, unless you go down next to the track on Railroad Ave. (I'm talking the prototype) most vistas are from a substantial elevation above the right of way.  Now contrast that with the upper deck scene at the Dry Canyon Viaduct.  While it is possible to take 4x4 roads all around that bridge, most vistas of it are from below and facing up the mountain, notwithstanding many magazine and book photos I've seen of it.  I'll get into this more in a minute when I answer Phillip and Rick's questions.  The bottom line is this -- AVOID TRIPLE DECK LAYOUTS unless you absolutely have to fit something in. [smile]

About the viaduct bridge.  Phillip and Rick wanted to see more pictures of it and hear more about it. 

050.jpg

052.jpg

 

067.jpg

068.jpg

This is a good shot to see how Black Butte connects to this scene.

072.jpg

This shot shows that the benchwork here is quite narrow, only about 12" actually.

The bridge was built with several Microengineering kits.  After I diagramed out the bridge I built the bents individually and set them aside.  The prototype bridge has a slightly different x bracing pattern on the bents, but I determined it wasn't worth the trouble to change it.  The lowest parts of the bents are scratchbuilt or otherwise modified from the kits to get them to conform with the terrain.  Next I built and assembled the plate girder bridge sections as per the instructions.  The prototype girder spans between bents is, I think, longer than the ME 50' section, but I went with it as part of my "selective compression".  I then got a 6' level and laid out all of the 30' and 50' spans and glued them into one massive string, clamping them to the level with clamps (there is an article on how to do this in some back issue I have).  Then I glued each bent tower to the appropriate location.  The bridge deck is all scratchbuilt from Evergreen styrene.  The prototype deck is ballasted.  When I inspected it a few years ago it seemed to have timber ties with sheet steel laid on top.  Then it had like a 2x12  rail to hold the ballast.  I bought some long sheets of .040 styrene and laminated two thicknesses of them together with the joints staggered.  The width of this lamination was the flex track tie width and the length was the bridge length.  Then I glued sections of .040 to the bottom of this strip to represent the steel plate.  I cut the bridge timber ties from styrene and carved wood grain into them.  These were glued to the upside down assembly.  Then I added the 2x12 out of styrene.  I fabricated all of the railing posts from .040x.040 styrene.  They had # 77 holes drilled into them for the railing and were then glued into place.  The railing is .010 brass wire.  Next time I would try fishing line or something, as the brass buckled a little during the final install.  I painted and weathered the deck and the rest of the superstructure seperately and only attatched them together  during final install,  The abutments and piers were cast in molds with plaster of paris.  The bridge is not attatched to the piers and abutments, it just rests on them.

Thanks again for your input.

mike

 

Mike Lozensky

Moder Railroader   Railroad Modeler

Reply 0
joef

Fantastic job, Mike!

Oh, you know how to get this SP fan's pulse rate up! 1980's SP ... what a nice layout ... oh-h-h-h boy.

It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking more is better - that's why my reverse running editorial back in issue 6 about that very topic. As the builder of a larger home layout myself, I know all too well how hard it can be to stay focused enough to make real progress on the layout.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
ChrisNH

Lower deck

Quote:

That lower deck is really low!

On a layout in my round robin group there is a third deck that is very very low. What the guy has done is put out a couple of rolling stools.. the kind you would find in an auto shop. It lets people sit comfortably at the height of that deck and still move up and down along its length. Its proven to be a popular place to work for the foot weary,

Not something I would do.. but I guess it has its niche.

Chris

“If you carry your childhood with you, you never become older.”           My modest progress Blog

Reply 0
jmoran426

A man after my own heart!

As and HO SP modeler, you've easily won me over with your selection of railroad, location, and scenery.  I would like to see the track-plan sketch and room dimensions.  I have been planning to add a building in my backyard for a trainroom, but for now belong to the RealRail Model Club in Bradenton, FL.  Having considered my own building plans, included in my thoughts were Sierra Nevada Mountains, high desert, agricultural valleys, timber, mining, etc.  I had thought about a double-decked layout, but I have to agree, three decks was not a thought.  How have you found the usefulness?  Would you change that?  Those are only some of the design aspects I would ask your valued experience about.  My parents live in the Nashville area (Franklin), so perhaps I could visit in the future.   Great job on scenery and equipment.  I love it.

John L. Moran

Reply 0
SPSHASTAROUTE

Chris, John

Hi Chris.  You ar right, the low deck is LOW!  I do use a chair when I'm down there, mainly when I'm blocking up a train in the staging yard. I have a cheap mini swiveling wheeled office-type chair that works good.  Dunsmuir has no scenery, buildings, or even most of the trackwork it will have, so trains don't loiter there much yet.

Hi John.  Gotta love the SP!  I have lost my original engineering drawings of the trackplan.  Sometime I would like to draw one up on a computer, but I have no software for doing so, and don't know which program to use really.  Perhaps someone has a suggestion on that?  Backyard building in Braedenton, huh.  Make sure it's air conditioned!!!  What era are you interested in?  Of course I like the Shasta route, but I also like the Modoc, the NWP, and Donner Pass.  The problem with these excepting some parts of the NWP is the lack of on-line customers.  If you're into lots of switching and locals, forget these.  SP across nevada has the same lack of on-line customers too.  I mainly like to see long freights running, so it's not as big a deal for me.  You may want to consider SP's west valley line, which ran from Gerber, CA to I think Davis, CA.  Lots of ag customers (reefers & sugar beets), some lumber mills, and the occasional through freight off the Oregon Division.  Were I to start from scratch again I would do the NWP from around Loleta, CA south as space would permit.  Staging would represent north and south connections, and the layout would feature plenty of industry (and not just all lumber mills, though I love them) plus some good mainline running up The Eel river canyon.

I hope your folks are ok in Franklin.  The floods of last weekend were particularly severe there.  We were fortunate at our house and only got a small puddle in the basement/layout room.  Lots of folks fared far, far worse!  Keep this area in your thoughts and prayers.

Mike

Mike Lozensky

Moder Railroader   Railroad Modeler

Reply 0
BlueHillsCPR

Track Planning Software

Quote:

Sometime I would like to draw one up on a computer, but I have no software for doing so, and don't know which program to use really.  Perhaps someone has a suggestion on that?

Mike,

If you don't mind buying the program, 3rd Planit is one of the best, IMO and there is a series of great tutorials in MRH, beginning with issue #1, on how to get up to speed with it.

All of these CAD programs have a fairly steep learning curve at first, so be prepared for that.  I have been told that AnyRail, is one of the easiest to learn but I have no personal experience with that application.

If FREE software is more to your liking, try XtrackCAD.  Again it has a steep learning curve but the help menu provides some great demo tutorials that help alot.  XtrackCAD does lack the 3D rendering capabilities of programs like 3rd Planit.

Reply 0
dfandrews

Astounding beautiful

Mike,

I am really at a loss for words to describe what you have done.  It is beatiful work.  As an SP fan (yet another) living in California, I have railfanned and travelled many of the areas you mentioned, and particularly the Sacramento canyon and parts of the Modoc line.  You have captured your chosen areas magnificently.  Thanks so much for sharing these photos with us so we may enjoy the views too.  It is really a railfan's holiday, second only to being there.

Thanks also for mentioning  the microclimates so characteristic of most parts of the west, and particularly of California.  I have not seen this mentioned in print anywhere, but it is necessary to understand if you're modeling SP out here.  

The Andesite/Upper Devil's Garden area is exceptional.  I remember the first time I traveled in that area, east of Mt. Lassen and then on the east side of Mt. Shasta, and encountered the volcanic plugs and fields of boulders and such, that looked more like a moonscape than earth.  Well done.

Thanks, again.  And of course, keep us posted.

Don - CEO, MOW super.

Rincon Pacific Railroad, 1960.  - Admin.offices in Ventura County

HO scale std. gauge - interchanges with SP; serves the regional agriculture and oil industries

DCC-NCE, Rasp PI 3 connected to CMRI, JMRI -  ABS searchlight signals

Reply 0
CabForward

Fantastic to say the least!

Mike,

Last Thursday, my wife and I drove from our home in the Portland metro area, to the San Francisco Bay area to attend a memorial service. We returned last evening.

We viewed many of the scenes incorporated in your layout. Like you said, Dunsmuir is in a very small, heavily wooded river valley. A great place to stop and take in the historical railroad town. To capture the entire area you need to do it from an upper hillside roadway, or by air. 

Your painting of Mt. Shasta is spot on. She was showing off all her majistic beauty last Thursday afternoon...not a cloud in sight. 

Thanks for sharing! I look forward to following your blog.

Rodger

Rodger Cook - Sherwood, OR

 

Reply 0
SPSHASTAROUTE

ME AGAIN

Thanks for the comments guys.

 

Mike Lozensky

Moder Railroader   Railroad Modeler

Reply 0
SP4274

SUPER Work.

 WELL, WOW!,

 

Nice layout man, Between you, JoeF and some others, you keep my hopes up that when i start my layout, it will be as nice as yours. in the planning stages of a N scale version of the SP cascade line cira 1992.

so like joe says any quality work on SP stuff gets my juices  flowing would like to see a track plan, even if its a crude drawing on MSpaint  im working on a double deck design, well 3 decks if you count staging.  with n scale  I dont need quiet the seperation that HO modelers requier, So i think im safe with the 3 levels.  all in all, great layout, been in the area many times. and you hit the nail on the head with the scenery. keep it up,

OH post some vids on youtube... that would really be awesome  

thanks for the dreaming

Jason 

 

 PS  good idea with starting sceanery on the top level,  never thought of that!!!

Reply 0
skiwiggy

Impressive

Hello Mike,

   I have been looking at your photos of the layout and have to say it is pretty awesome looking!  I am also impressed by the styrene work you have done with the freight car project!  

 

GREG

Reply 0
SPSHASTAROUTE

Thanks Greg.  Check out my

Thanks Greg.  Check out my update just posted on the all-door build.  I just finished airbrushing the cars, so I'm on the home stretch now!  Hope to do some more layout scenery later this year.  I envy the completed state of your D&H layout scenery, plus it just looks fabulous!

Mike

Mike Lozensky

Moder Railroader   Railroad Modeler

Reply 0
skiwiggy

Layout!

Thanks Mike,

The current layout is one I started in 1987 and is at my parents house!  I hope to buy a new home in the next few years that will allow me to create something as grand as your layout!  I always tell my wife that she can pick the house but, I get to pick the basement!  

I have to travel about 30 miles to do any work on the layout and usually get two good days in a month to work on it! Not being so close allowed me to concentrate on building structures, lots of resin freight car kits that totally replaced a fleet of old Athearn and MDC cars!  The last three years I have been working on creating a whole fleet of as accurate as possible D&H 2-8-0 steamers!  So far I have been able to complete about 7 different models of the 2-8-0's!  My goal is to be able to create a layout based on parts of the Rutland & D&H railroads!  

 

GREG

Reply 0
Steam Donkey

Inspirational Stuff!

Hi Mike,

What you've created so far is nothing short of spectacular, I keep coming back to this post to check out your photos!  (I won't mention the drooling part, it's  embarrassing).

I love the way your trains snake through the mountains, the curving benchwork certainly makes you feel as if you're high in the mountains possibly following along from a winding river.

Personally, I'm in the middle of designing a double deck HO layout complete with a low third level (guess it's really a triple decker) for staging and a center peninsula with a blob at the end. My layout space is 12'x28', similar to your 14'x24' space. 

Is there any chance that you could post a track plan? Perhaps something hand sketched and scanned? What you have visually "works", and I'd love to replicate that feel on my layout.

Keep up the great work, and please post more pics! 

 

Stan

 

Reply 0
Blues

Your layout

Mike,  Love your work!  My wife and I are about to begin construction of a new home with a large area dedicated to a model railroad.  I like the looks that you have acheived and think that they capture the idea of modeling a mountain railroad.  I'm curious if you have ever published a track plan of your mrr.  I plan on a multideck and have considered a mushroom or partial mushroom design.  I am obviously in the very early planning stages, but would really appreciate your input.

 

I plan to model the UP La Grande Subdivision in eastern Oregon and am currently trying to figure out a workable track arrangement for my space and I think that seeing what you did would help!

 

Thanks!

 

Jeff

Reply 0
Reply