jmt99atsf

I finally finished the second of two spline helices for my N-scale layout that is under construction.  I have included a video, this time with sound, since it is a sound equipped engine, that shows the results of the first DCC test of the second helix.

I had previously performed DC only tests to check for proper track power, any alignment problems, or any other issues to be discovered.  This time I opted to test using a DCC test.  I used an NCE Power Cab for the test.  The engine used was a Model Power 4-6-2 Pacific that had been converted to DCC using a Tsunami sound decoder.  I also attached four (4) Kato and or IMRC (Centralia) passenger cars to test the pulling power of the engine.  The video shows the result.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have also been doing some touch ups on the first helix that was built in 2012.  For example, adjusting the threaded rods so that they do not protrude too high from the spline roadbed.  I have also installed a loop (that will be visible and sceniced) above the helix.  A little while ago, I showed a picture of a loop that looked like a horse shoe.  See below.


_helix_1.jpg 

The photo below shows what the "horse shoe" looks like installed above the helix with biscuit joint cuts made. for joining to the next sections (lower and upper).  I plan on the upper level going to a surrogate station for Ottawa, KS and eventually to a visible staging loop in the center peninsula at the third level (approximately 53" or so high).  The loop would represent a surrogate city for Tulsa, OK.  The visible staging on the upper level of the peninsula will reduce the need for 4 tracks in the hidden staging yards.

  Also, note that all of the threaded rods are adjusted to their final height.  I am waiting for the delivery of some MTH terminal boards for power distribution in both helices.  You can see the pigtails of the track feeders in many of the pictures.  I plan on feeding power every half loop.  It may be overkill but I want to make sure that the track had proper power in all places. 

ve_helix.jpg 

Once the power distribution is installed and the threaded rods are adjusted on the second helix, I will continue work on the staging level. 

If anyone has any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. 

Thanks again for looking.

John

Blog index:  https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/jmt99atsf-blog-index-12219303
Reply 0
James Leighty Jim Leighty

Threaded rod side brackets

What are the interesting metal side brackets that fasten the threaded rod to the helix framework? I was going to drill holes for my threaded rods but this looks like an easier method. Thanks, jim

Jim Leighty

Central New York and New England Railroad

Blog: https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/jim-leightys-blog-index-12227310

0tiny(1).JPG

Reply 0
bnsf6951

HELIX

nice job on the helix & how well the loco runs...i would suggest adding some more feeder wires.

vinny...aka...bnsf6951

Reply 0
nbeveridge

Power Feeds

You think that one set of feeds to each loop is enough?  Seriously?  If you are going to use DCC, you need to feed each piece of track.  Do not rely on rail joiners or even wire jumpers.  Guess how I know!?!!

Norman

Reply 0
tjc

Brackets

Hello Jim,

Quote:

What are the interesting metal side brackets that fasten the threaded rod to the helix framework?

I was also admiring the bracket work.  The brackets appear to be eye bolts screwed into the spline with the rod passing through the eye.  Very clever!

 

Tom

Reply 0
James Leighty Jim Leighty

Overdoing feeders

If you use properly sized wire, one feeder will service 6 feet of track to each side of the feeder. Solder your rail joiners and spend that time and money on fun stuff, not wiring. You are overdoing it!

Jim Leighty

Central New York and New England Railroad

Blog: https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/jim-leightys-blog-index-12227310

0tiny(1).JPG

Reply 0
jmt99atsf

Attaching Threaded Rods to Helix

I used screw eyes to attach the threaded rod to the sides of the spline.  I used two sizes, first an Ace Hardware product, 1-3/8" long with a 1/4" eye opening and, second, a product that I bought on eBay, 1-9/16" long with a 5/8" eye opening.  The reason that I switched was that our Ace burned down in Feb 2013 and I had to find an alternate source.  I now think that the longer one with the larger eye worked better since I did not have any vertical alignment problems when building the second one.  Using the screw eyes allows the roadbed, whether it is spline or plywood, to not have to be wider to accommodate the drill through attachment of the rod.  By doing it that way, I was able to maximize the radius of the helix.  Hope that helps.

 

 

Reply 0
jmt99atsf

Helix

Thanks for the kind comments.

I am waiting for some electrical stuff that I ordered to finish hooking up the feeders.   Each turn is about 15-16 feet long, the track joints are all soldered, and the feeders are placed about 7-8 feet apart.  I do plan on going vertical on both ends of the helix with the power bus. There may be too many feeders but better to have too many than too few.

I will post some pictures when I finish the wiring of the helix.

John

Reply 0
jmt99atsf

Power Feeds

Thanks for the comments about the electrical for DCC.  That is exactly why the track joints are all soldered, and the feeders are placed about 7-8 feet apart, i.e., two sets per turn plus the entry and the exit (not yet installed at the top).

I will post some pictures when I finish the wiring of the helix.

John

 

Reply 0
jmt99atsf

Overdoing Feeders - Maybe or Maybe not

Thanks for the comments.

There are two sets of feeders for each of the two tracks on the helix spaced apart about 7-8 feet  which is about every two to three track sections plus a little.  Each turn is approximately 15-16 feet long and all of the track is soldered together.  I don't have an RMS meter but I do plan on getting one in the near future.  If I determine that there are too many feeders, then I will get rid of some of them.

I enjoy the planning and building aspects of the hobby and so I am not in a hurry to finish the layout.  Since I am retired I like to take my time and enjoy what I am doing, after all,  it has taken since April 2012 to build both of the spline helices. I had a lot of fun building them but do not plan on building any more of them.  

John

Reply 0
ctxmf74

"the feeders are placed about 7-8 feet apart"

That sounds fine. N scale locos don't need a lot of current to run. I try to put in feeders every other piece of flextrack which is about 6 feet apart but I wouldn't worry if they are 7 or 8 feet apart..DaveBranum

Reply 0
James Leighty Jim Leighty

Great idea!

John, I think your idea of using screw eyes on the outside of the helix is terrific! It should support things just as well and will allow for greater radii for the track. Your two feeders per revolution should be fine. I just meant that one per 36"track section is not necessary if you solder your rail joints properly. Good luck,

Jim Leighty

Central New York and New England Railroad

Blog: https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/jim-leightys-blog-index-12227310

0tiny(1).JPG

Reply 0
ctxmf74

" screw eyes on the outside of the helix "

   The advantage I can see for threaded rod is better hand access to the tracks to fix future problems or derailments. The radius would be the same using wooden blocks as the roadbed could be cut wider to the same radius as the outside of the metal eye bolts. The advantage of wooden blocks is once the first loop is set correctly the others don't need any adjustment, just stack and shoot the blocks and roadbed in place, installing the track as the loops rise......DaveBranum

Reply 0
James Leighty Jim Leighty

Helix radius

Every one builds their helix according to how much space they have available. Using spacer blocks or drilling holes for the threaded rods results in more meat needed in the framework and therefore less space available for the actual radius of the track work. Therefore, using the method discussed with the threaded rods on the outside will allow for increased track radius in the same spaced used. Very smart thinking indeed!

Jim Leighty

Central New York and New England Railroad

Blog: https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/jim-leightys-blog-index-12227310

0tiny(1).JPG

Reply 0
ctxmf74

"the threaded rods on the outside will allow for increased"

  The eye bolt heads are 5/8" diameter so the roadbed could just be cut 5/8 wider and the same radius would result. The roadbed outside edge would align with the outside edge of the eyebolt circle and the spacer blocks would sit on the same radius line as the threaded rods.  The way to minimize helix radius would be to use thin metal framing straps for the supports and screw them flat against the outside of the roadbed, this would only use up about 1/8 inch of radius outside the actual roadbed. The metal straps would be even harder to adjust than the threaded rods though so they would need to be screwed accurately the first try. Spacer blocks eliminate this problem entirely ....DaveBranum  

Reply 0
jmt99atsf

Use of the Threaded Rods to Support the Spline

Good point. 

The first helix used the 1/4" screw eyes and the second one that I just finished used the 5/8" ones. The tables that I built for the two helices were constrained to 48" wide primarily to achieve the goal of a 36" minimum aisle width.  Their length was not constrained.

The outside track radius that I settled on was 22 1/2", so with some easement into the two 18" long straight sections plus the track width, and some clearance to the outside of the spline, I felt that the maximum diameter had been achieved, especially since the outside edge of the spline was less than an inch from the outside of the table structure at that point on both the front and back of the support table. I did consider using a stiff metal/steel strapping but I really liked the adjustability of the threaded rods. 

If I had built a single track helix then I would have used the threaded rod through the spline roadbed method.

Also, when I started this project there were several comments about the size of hands and that I did not have enough room to put my hand in between the turns.  Spacer blocks would have reduced the available space somewhat as compared to the threaded rods which is why I did not opt to use them.  I think that I watched Jeff Johnston's YouTube video about building a helix at least 10 times with his use of the spacer blocks.

John

Reply 0
ctxmf74

" would have reduced the available space "

  Yeah ,that's definitely an advantage of the threaded rods especially in N scale where access can get quite tight. They give a nice open appearance too. I wonder if anyone has ever used the threaded rods with pieces of plastic pipe cut to the same length and used like spacer blocks? That should eliminate the need to adjust all the nuts as the whole stack could be assembled and then tightened from the top? .......DaveBranum

Reply 0
jmt99atsf

Threaded Rods and PVC

Dave,

Once again great idea. I think that Easy Helix uses something like that for the helix that they sell.

Also, during the research for the project, I think that I remember seeing some use of small PVC pipe to build a helix in postings on the web from Australia (?).  Also, I found  a picture in a Yahoo or Google search where someone had used screw eyes for a plywood helix (which gave me the idea for mine) but could not find the website from where it came. 

John

Reply 0
ctxmf74

The plan?

   Hi John, Maybe I missed it but do you have your track plan posted here? The helix looks well planned so I want to see the rest of the design?..DaveBranum

Reply 0
jmt99atsf

The Plan for the ATSF Fillmore Division

Dave,

Thanks for asking. First a little background.  From 2004-2010, I was building an N-scale version of Bruce Chubb's original Sunset Valley (see "How to Operate your Model Railroad" by Bruce Chubb, 1977) in a large room in the house.  All of the cities had been built and it was running electrically.  A big investment in buildings had been made to reflect the look and feel of the industries that he had in the various cities and towns on the Sunset Valley.  My version of the SV was called the ATSF Fillmore Division.  I have boxes of already assembled buildings that I had collected probably from 1999 so I did not want to lose that when I had to move the layout out of the main house into its own outbuilding in early 2012.

Here are three diagrams that reflect the plans for the layout that I am now building.

The first diagram shows where the freelanced ATSF Fillmore Division fits into the real world.  The real names of the cities are in parenthesis under the fictional name.  Michaelson, San Angela, Jamestown, and Elizabeth City are named after my four children.  The equivalent cites, for track layout and industries, on the Sunset Valley to my planned layout are (SV/ATSF_FD): East Fork/Jamestown, San Clemente/San Angela, Dunsmuir Summit/Elizabeth City, and Walnut Creek/Michaelson.  The plans for John's Creek will be closer to the possible combination of Morris and Holliday from Chuck Hitchcock's ATSF Argentine Division (see Model Railroad Planning, 1997).  Michaelson Junction is designed loosely from the ATSF track charts for Ottawa Junction.  Fillmore will end up being a combination of Dr. Muff's Kansas City track plan and the SV's Fillmore depending on what exactly will fit when I get around to building that part of the layout.  Detailed design of each city/town are in hand sketch form at present.  I also have a lot of Peco turnouts from the previous layout that I hope to re-use.

_div_map.jpg 

The second diagram shows the planned functional design of the layout.   The extra loop that I added to the helix will be visible and the route to get from Michaelson Jct. (Ottawa Jct.) to Michaelson (Ottawa) to Elizabeth City (Tulsa) which will be in the center on the peninsula similar to what Dunsmuir summit looked like on the SV with some additional industries (oil of course).



_funcdes.jpg 

The third diagram shows the staging level on which I am currently building.  When I built each helix, I had to do a rough design of the interface, to include grade calculations) between the helix and the next section, both at the staging level and at the main level.

_staging.jpg 

Reply 0
Reply