MRH-RE

0-01-p51.jpg 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buy this issue!

 

 

 

 

 

Please post any comments or questions you have here.

Reply 0
Benny

...

Very nice work, Larry.  Thank you.

--------------------------------------------------------

Benny's Index or Somewhere Chasing Rabbits

Reply 0
Graham Line

Lawndale

Well-written and well-researched article about an operation I would never have known about otherwise.

Reply 0
Oztrainz

Modelling On30 Lawndale locomotives 4&5

Hi Larry, all,

First off, congratulations Larry on a well-researched and put-together article on the Lawndale. I'd heard about the Lawndale but never followed up on what and where it was in the US. Your article filled in this knowledge gap very nicely.

In the early days of Bachmann in On30, there were several "near-enough" #4 and #5 Lawndale locomotives made by splicing the On30 2-6-0 locomotive body onto a Bachmann HO Consolidation 2-8-0 chassis. Apparently the smaller wheel diameter of the 2-8-0 chassis fitted pretty well under the 2-6-0 body to get a 30" gauge Lawndale locomotive reasonably easily. The wheel diameters and spacing for this chassis were "close enough" to make this work in 1/48 scale. Given that a lot of the early On30 Bachmann offerings were based on 3' gauge prototypes, maybe "bashing" some of the other rolling stock might get you a Lawndale train for an lesser amount of effort, rather than fully scratch-building everything in On3?    

The how-to's of how this chassis matching was done was lost when the first incarnation of the On30Conspiracy Yahoo group was disappeared without notice by Yahoo in about 2005, but I can remember it being done by several in the US. 

Food for future modelling thought? 

Regards,

John Garaty

Unanderra in oz

Read my Blog

Reply 0
kansaspacific1

LAWNDALE...Well done, most interesting

Thank you Larry, and thank you Joe and staff for publishing this.

Reply 0
joef

Nice to see something besides Colorado NG

Yes, it’s nice to see something besides Colorado narrow gauge! Nothing against Colorado NG, it’s very cool, but it’s also very over-exposed and covered ad naseum in the hobby press. Thank you Larry for covering a different narrow gauge operation in depth. Looks like it would make for some very interesting modeling. And for those who say there’s only RTR modeling and that’s all, think again! Here’s a real craftsman prototype to model!

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
David Husman dave1905

Dummy

Very interesting line.

Just a clarification the brakeman carrying a stick is not using it to chock wheels, that's a brake stick or club, it has a pick handle end that they hold and the top half is roughly square.  It was used to stick in the brake wheel spokes for extra leverage tightening handbrakes.   I have one someplace downstairs.  Very common in the steam era. 

Picture 15 shows a brakeman standing on a car holding one of the brake clubs.

Dave Husman

Visit my website :  https://wnbranch.com/

Blog index:  Dave Husman Blog Index

Reply 0
steamhed

The Lawndale

Informative with great photos. Thanks and congratulations to the author, Larry Smith.

Throughly enjoyed this presentation of a unique Narrow Gauge road.

Ron Pope

 

Reply 0
Raphael

Thanks for this marvelous historical research

Such a pleasure to read. I loved all the columns in the early MRH. Folks who enjoyed this may want to (re)read the archives.

Ralf~
[ web site ]

Reply 0
joef

We agree, Larry Smith does a great job

We agree, Larry Smith does a great job with his prototype-you-can-model stories featuring backwoods shortlines and narrow gauge lines. I told Larry when he first approached me to write for the Lite & Narrow column that I wanted much more than just Colorado narrow gauge. Nothing against Colorado NG per se, it's a great prototype, but it's gotten tons of exposure. I asked Larry to seek out and cover the other narrow gauge lines around North America, they deserved to get some press too, and I suspected many of them would be great prototypes for a model railroad. Larry has done just that, so thank you so very much for an excellent job, Larry!

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Neil Erickson NeilEr

Please sir, may I have some more?

This article reminded me of how much I enjoy reading about the fallen flags. Well done Larry!

I’d sure like to see more of this type of research here. Even modern roads, industrial lines, and short lines. While many have been acquired by larger managing corporations, the layout design of today favors fewer towns and industries that could be modeled faithfully with little compression. 
 

Please consider providing the track plan or, at least, a sketch of the major stations or end of line. This little railroad seems to be oozing with character and the engine house, wye, station on a switchback, as well as the warehouses could keep me happily busy for quite some time. In particular the light rail and spindly trestles make my heart skip a beat. Lol. 

Neil Erickson, Hawai’i 

My Blogs

Reply 0
dapenguin

Sn3??

In Sn3 there is the Railmaster kits.  John will customize them anyway he can to fit what ya want.

TC Carr
Malheur, Kopperton & Tejas * Sn3½ in 1923
(the I don't know yet) * Sn2 "Gilpin in Idaho"
​Anaconda, Oregon & Pacific * S Scale Heavy Electric
My Blog Index

Reply 0
fecbill

Neil check Taplines

Neil and others check out Taplines.com that Larry referenced at the end of the article. It is a very good site of old railroads like this one. One of my favorites on the site is Live,Oak, Perry and Gulf. 

 

Bill Michael

Florida East Coast Railway fan

Modeling FEC 5th District in 1960 

 

Reply 0
Neil Erickson NeilEr

Magazine articles

Thanks Bill. I like these types of articles that are well written and paint a big picture, including how it might be modeled. Magazines like MRH, MR, NG&SLG, or RMC are the perfect venue for “Railroads you can model” since they are curated by the publisher, edited, and presented in a way that I enjoy without spending so much time doing my own research. I’d rather be building models or working on my layout. 
 

This forum does provide an opportunity to interact with other modelers and feel part of a community while throwing my vote toward Joe about what types of things I would pay to see in the magazine. The topics that invite controversy have no interest to me and should be squashed from the outset. MHO! 

Neil Erickson, Hawai’i 

My Blogs

Reply 0
joef

@NielEr

Neil, we agree with you on topics “that just invite controversy” ... which is why we’ve moved away from so much editorial content in MRH and RE. If you notice, even the Publishers Welcome in RE is mostly modeling how to tips and not “editorial fluff” ... and my MRH editorials now focus more on modeling and doing the hobby topics. We retired the Reverse Running column, and we also retired the staff notes section. The reasoning was simple: with MRH we can only put the number of pages in that ads will pay for. Ad placements peaked in 2016 and are now down about 40% from that peak. So with a smaller MRH, the first pages to get the axe were the editorial fluff ... meanwhile we keep as much modeling how-tos as we can ... and we even now use the minimal “editorial space” to focus on thoughts on doing the hobby better. The new smaller MRH is now a very tight ship that’s modeling how-tos end to end around the ads. And of course Running Extra is all meat and virtually zero editorial content.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Neil Erickson NeilEr

Thanks

Joe (I wish the @Joe would trigger a notification but drupal ... );

Thanks for the kind response. My own response went a little off the rails as well. A few beers and I seem to go off topic easily but glad you responded regarding this anyway. Reverse Running was always a good read. It got a lot of entertaining responses forum afterward. I’m actually sad to see these go but understand the economics of the decision. 
 

Two things come to mind. First, I would like to see more articles like this as well as in depth “how-to’s” published.  Secondly, it wouldn’t hurt my feelings to see advertising that isn’t directly model railroad related. I would patronize people who provide products or services and willing to support the magazine. That would include my own business i.e. putting my money where my mouth is. 
 

Thanks for working with authors to bring us the best of what is being done. This is my go-to spot to keep up but wish it could be updated to allow simple kudos and notifications. Not your thing, I know, but has made other venues attractive to visit. 

Neil Erickson, Hawai’i 

My Blogs

Reply 0
Reply