kziebarth

When I decided to put some scenery along a two track staging area along one side of my room things got a little out of hand, as usual. I added another track for a small stockyard left over from a previous module. And I needed a place for a recently retired (it’s 1959) coal and water stop. All of this required a simple backdrop. The scene I had in mind stretched across a narrow band of two slides taken from several miles away. Just zooming in and splicing would not have left any ‘photo-realism’. Besides this is a layout, it’s a representation, made by me. I have tried painting backdrop by projecting a slide etc. but not been happy with the result. So I decided to ‘paint’ the backdrop directly from the photograph using PhotoShop Elements. Using filters and effects to sharpen edges and create ‘watercolor paint daubs’ I created a ‘photo-unrealistic’ backdrop. Printed in sections on photo paper with the sky trimmed off, and then spliced together on foam core, it is mounted against the wall previously painted sky blue. Foreground cover and some vegetation along the bottom edge, along with track and ballast, complete the scene.

24-59_81.jpg 

And for background, here is my 1954 Brownie snapshot of the actual coal and water station that I had in mind.  It was located between Miles City and Terry, Montana at a "station" called Benz.  Nothing remains except the BNSF main line.

coal.jpg 

My next backdrop projects will be behind the stockyard mentioned above, including a gravel road into the distance, and behind a bridge showing continuation of a river and hiding staging behind that.

Ken Ziebarth, Boulder

Reply 0
Scarpia

Bigger image

can you post a bigger image? I'm curious about your work, but I'm having a hard time seeing it in that small picture.

Thanks!


HO, early transition erahttp://www.garbo.org/MRRlocal time PST
On30, circa 1900  

 

Reply 0
kziebarth

A little bigger

I now made it as big as the blog screen allows.  The phone camera image is not sharp enough for much more.

I have a couple more images of this to post once I figure out how this blog editor works.

Ken Z

Reply 0
wp8thsub

Hmmmm...

It's still a bit tough to judge the outcome from the larger photo due to the resolution, but the results look like they may be effective.  The scene could pass for someplace along the Yellowstone River in eastern Montana, or the Little Missouri in North Dakota.

Rob Spangler MRH Blog

Reply 0
kziebarth

Great guess!!  Along

Great guess!!  Along the Yellowstone just east of Miles City.

Ken Z

Reply 0
kziebarth

More pictures

Figured out the image posting system!

I now added the other view of the backdrop, and an 'historical' image of the Benz coal and water station.

Ken Z

Reply 0
arthurhouston

Perspective is your issue.

This is toughest part to get right. Yes the big object is in front, but what you are trying to put in background is also very big. Two ways to learn this, one watch 10 of Bob Ross landscape paintings. Then get Dan's book form KB on how to paint backdrops. You have to established a horizon line and work from their.
Reply 0
kziebarth

Perspective

Art:

Of course you are correct.  Thanks for getting me thinking a little more.  

A rough estimate of the actual angles subtended by the height of the foreground train and the background bluff shows the ratio might be about .005, meaning that the image of the bluff should be a fraction of an inch high.  

For my next background project, on the other side of the room, I am experimenting with tapering the height and progressively graying the image to more clearly represent distance.

But I also consider the operative word for any such modeling is 'representation', not 'reproduction'.  And the earlier commenter did immediately recognize the geography that I was representing.

Ken Z

 

Reply 0
Reply