Kirk W kirkifer

Alright Gang, 

Here is another example of turning a sow's ear into a silk purse. 

First, look at what I saw at a model club in Inland NW on a recent visit. 

B1715%5D.jpg 

I guess it was convincing enough that I asked one of the members about the Tyco cars. His reply was he didn't know there were any such cars on the layout. 

B1717%5D.jpg 

 

 

To me, it looks like the log racks are a little big. I am sure some of this was done for durability? At the end of the day, this is simply a 4 foot model and it captures the flavor of log cars. Here you can see them in a train and with logs loaded.

B1718%5D.jpg 

 

B1719%5D.jpg 

 

When I returned home, I looked at my junk bin and found a couple of the old Tyco pulpwood racks. These are the very same cars I saw with log racks out at that club in Spokane. Something still looked wrong, so I decided to turn the bulkheads around and see what could be done. 

B1699%5D.jpg 

So, what do you think? Okay, you hard core guys. These are not painted, detailed or finished. This is just the initial question on whether or not I should continue down this rabbit hole. Will these make decent 4 foot models and fill in for all of those unique log cars that my timber collection branch lines will need?

B1698%5D.jpg 

One of the things I did was to narrow the width of the log bunks. Intially, I made them so the uprights were flush with the outside of the car frame. This was following the example from that club. I had already felt like those bunks looked too big. After measuring my rendition, it shows the similar looking bunks made the overall width around 12' which I think is too much. Plate C clearance is only 10' 8".  Now, they are slightly narrower than 10'. They are just slightly bigger than the cast metal ones from Details West. 

B1701%5D.jpg 

 

B1700%5D.jpg 

One thing I have not figured out is what I need to do with the newly turned bulkhead. It needs more bracing and probably a ladder. I guess I'll play with that a little. 

 

As I was searching the internet, I found these Illinois Central cars that look vaguely similar to the Tyco cars after the bulkheads are turned around. Isn't it funny that Tyco almost had a model that would have been all over model railroads today? They lost when they turned the bulkeads the wrong direction. Too bad.

95%20(1).jpg 

 

Kirk Wakefield
Avon, Indiana
 

 

Reply 1
Prof_Klyzlr

SEICO

Dear Kirk,

The IC car basis looks awfully like a SEICO bulkhead pulpwood flat?
(See Walthers for HO example)

Happy Modelling,
Aim to Improve,
Prof Klyzlr

 

Reply 1
Pat M

Inspirational

Thanks for sharing! 
I could use some pulpwood flatcars of the 50’ variety, I might have to have another look at the TYCO flats again.

ter_fade.jpg
Reply 1
Kirk W kirkifer

Yes, Prof.

I know it's not the same. 

I just thought it was kinda close and in a train, especially in an operations environment where you are looking more at car numbers and so forth, I thought it would be plausable to use these cars? I still would like opinions about this. 

Kirk Wakefield
Avon, Indiana
 

 

Reply 1
Kirk W kirkifer

It just seemed to work

Hey Pat, 

I was going to use flatcars with log racks from Details West. In fact, I was never going to use these Tyco cars, but realizing that the real logging railroads used a variety of commercial manufacturers combined with things they cobbled together in their shops, I think it would be hard to say these were never real. 

My understanding is that 40' cars or so were much more common. After turning the bulkheads around, the actual length of the cargo area is only a little over 40'. So, I am not sure what dictated car length. Was it tight radius track or was it ensuring a 40' log couldn't shift too much? 

Kirk Wakefield
Avon, Indiana
 

 

Reply 1
Mustangok

"Free" freight cars

This is excellent use of existing materials. High rolling stock prices has been a recent subject on the boards and converting the unwanted into the useful is a great idea.

The kitbash looks promising to me and quite similar to the proto photo. The IC car has the vertical racks more evenly spaced, without the slightly wider center gap you've modeled, but you've really captured the overall impression.

Kent B

Reply 1
Chris VanderHeide cv_acr

40' Pulpwood cars

Quote:

I am not sure what dictated car length.

40' was kind of the standard freight car size.

In a lot of cases, standard flatcar frames were modified with bulkheads and risers, and that was the standard size for flatcars.

When purpose built flats with V-decks were built, I'm sure they followed the general sizing of other cars in service at the time.

Reply 1
Chris VanderHeide cv_acr

Bulkheads and Pulpwood Car Design

Quote:

As I was searching the internet, I found these Illinois Central cars that look vaguely similar to the Tyco cars after the bulkheads are turned around. Isn't it funny that Tyco almost had a model that would have been all over model railroads today? They lost when they turned the bulkeads the wrong direction. Too bad.

I don't know whether the TYCO car is based on anything specific, but "wraparound" end racks for this type of car aren't *necessarily* un-realistic. (Athearn had a similar 40' pulpwood car with similar ends, so they must have based at least the concept on something.)

Also, note that these weren't intended for 40' logs, but 4' logs, loaded crosswise in two rows. The raised edge at the side of the car serves the slant the logs into the middle of the car making a V-shaped load. Later pulpwood cars were built with V-shaped sloped decks.

My railroad shipped logs in ~8' lengths, not 4', but converted a number of old 40' flats with similar ends and plain decks:

http://canadianfreightcargallery.ca/cgi-bin/image.pl?i=ac2343&o=ac

http://vanderheide.ca/blog/2014/09/04/ac-2300-series-flatcars/

If you're going to cut off the ends and reverse them for bulkhead ends, I'd throw them out completely and scratchbuild new ones. The reason to slant the bulkheads the other way is to have a solid end on the car to prevent shifting loads, with a solid face and heavy reinforcing brackets in behind it to absorb impacts.

Logs loaded crosswise don't really shift end to end in a car, since they completely fill the loading area of the car.

Reply 1
blindog10

Putting obsolete flat cars back to work

The main reason for using ~40-foot flatcars is they had them and they'd been superceded by larger cars.  The UP also converted 42-foot gons into log cars for the same reason.

The old Athearn "pulpwood flat" is said to be based on a small series of Mopac cars.  Every pulpwood flat I've seen has a V-shaped floor to keep the logs from falling off.  The IC car pictured started life as a traditional pulpwood flat.  NS converted many of theirs the same way to haul longer sticks.  KCS converted some to haul coil steel.

I'd say the best way to make the Tyco bulkheads look more realistic would be to add sloped bracing up the middle.

Scott Chatfield 

Reply 1
Benny

...

Another great use of the Tyco fleet!

There's a lot of good mileage left in these cars, with an upgrade here and there.  Trucks, couplers and weight.  The rest is a matter of process.

I'll have to make myself some bunks here soon...

--------------------------------------------------------

Benny's Index or Somewhere Chasing Rabbits

Reply 1
YoHo

I think it's a very plausible

I think it's a very plausible looking car. Personally I would have kept the pulpwood bulkheads the normal way and I would have used the details west log poles. Or made my own that were closer to the DW castings in size.

The poles you have look sized for a longer flat. Portland and Western has a series of bulkhead flats converted to Log cars that they acquired. They are based on a more modern bulkhead flat design. I personally am looking assorted MDC Bulkhead flats purchased at Trainshows as the basis for my more modern fleet. Not correct for what PNWR runs, but it will look reasonable enough. 

Reply 1
Reply