Looks good

Just need 4 more leds.  Russ

Thank you so much for the

Thanks

Judging by the track plan

Judging by the track plan grid, the curve minimum radius appears to be about 24 inches.  I didn't see a scale listed (HO or N?).  If HO what ware the longest cars you are running?  If you are running full-length passenger cars, then 24 inch radius will be rather sharp and you may have issues depending on the longer rolling stock being run.

Yes HO scale...more of an

What era?

You may not be running passenger cars, but 89 foot freight cars and long locomotives will have the same problems with a 24 inch radius.

Era mid 50's...

LED colors

I would suggest using single color LEDs.  On and off will be easier to quickly see which track is selected.  Also I would suggest LEDs on both legs of the turnouts.

Some color-blind people cannot tell the difference between the red and green LEDs.

I would swap the position of the short and long crossovers at the right end of the yard.

Not sure I get what u

Tommy, excuse me for poking my nose in...

...but I was thinking about your yard design. Maybe it would be a bit awkward to operate so I made a few suggested adjustments, hope you don't mind!  My idea was to flip the yard vertically. That makes the yard ladder more accessible from the aisle for switching, gets you more yard lead length at the right side, and larger radius on the main and lead. Also you could have larger radius on the main and longer tracks at the left side of the yard, but at the expense of one industry spur. Rough sketch:

HTH but by all means tell me to mind my own business! 

Suggested Changes

Sorry the drawing changes are crude but it should give you the idea of what I was suggesting. 

I don't mind at all..open to

Suggested changes

I apologize if this got posted twice and sorry about the poor drawing quality on the changes.  This should give you an idea of what I was suggesting  What drawing program are you guys using? 

PeteM's suggestion

I noticed two things about PeteM's suggested alternative that would be negatives *if* (and only if) you are manually operating switches with ground throws or finger  flicks.

In your original arrangement, if the yard tracks are completely full of cars, you don't have to reach over the cars to throw the yard turnouts because the longest yard track is furthest from the aisle. But with PeteM's arrangement, you'd have to reach over cars on the long tracks to throw the switches for the short tracks.

The second thing is that in your arrangement, you're not reaching over the mainline to throw switches, but in PeteM's arrangement you are, creating the potential for having a hand hitting a through train as it passes, should you be planning on running a mainline continuous train while  switching the yard with a second engine.

Obviously with electrically controlled switches or even fasica-mounted pull rods both these points go out the window.

I've been assuming the yard operator is standing on the 'north' side of the table.

OK my bad

Eastwind, I thought the aisle was below (south of) the yard as the most northerly track is elevated. But now I realize it could be below the main line. I was trying to achieve the exact opposite of your comments! My yard is very similar to what  I drew and with the aisle below (south) I never have to reach over cars, and with the main at the back, no risk of hitting moving trains. Oh well, as you were...  

duh

Ooops, Well, now that I look again I think you're right. For some reason, I  saw the plan as a table-top in the middle of a room style, with aisle around the outside and maybe a popup in the middle. But now I see where the interior aisle is, and it's not on the north side as I was thinking before. So never mind my post.