Craig Thomasson BNML2

The last several days have quite productive. Benchwork is up on the wall, I've started setting up OperationsPro, and I was able to get to Dallas a day of prototype research.

Benchwork

The hollow core doors have a 3/4" layer of foam on top, and a few tweaks to the front shelf. I picked up some shelf brackets for the office wall and got them mounted.

1_185832.jpg 

1_185924.jpg 

One tweak was to cut the shelf ends at 45 degree angles. It makes the pieces fit together much better and the joint almost disappears.  At the connection, I've got lots of interlocking pieces to keep everything lined up.  I also laid the foam out so I could use the interlocking edges at the joint.

Now here's a slight problem...

1_191929.jpg 

Because of an existing bookshelf, the rail height is at 64.5".  That's right around eye level for me.  My wife hits the bottom of the benchwork with the middle of her forehead!  At least having a duck-under won't be an issue!

I can use shorter shelf brackets which will lower the layout by an inch.  I could set half the layout directly on the bookshelf, but I prefer to have the whole layout secured to the same surface.  On the bookshelf, half the layout would be vulnerable to shaking if the bookshelf or attached desk is bumped. 

OperationsPro

Now that my track plan is pretty much nailed down, I can start tinkering with JMRI's OperationsPro. I've been reading the online documentation as well as the worked example from this site a few years ago ( http://rcairgallery.com/stuff/Using-JMRI-Operations-A-Worked-Example.pdf). Enough reading, let's jump in with both feet!

I already have my rolling stock in a home-grown database, so it was simply a matter of exporting it to a .csv file and importing into OperationsPro. I have developed my own car types loosely based on the UMLER specification.  I wanted something that was more descriptive than the AAR car types  (XM - a boxcar), but didn't need a secret decoder ring like UMLER (B433 - unequipped boxcar, Inside length at least 49’ and less than 59’, cushioned, Mech. desig. XM, plug door, inside width at least 9’6”, Door opening at least 9’ and less than 10’ wide, ...). The specification I developed provides similar details as UMLER but in a way that should be easy to pick up by visiting crews.  Below is a sampling of car types that can appear on the Office Park.

TypecodeDescription
BC250
50 ft combo door box
BP15050 ft single plug door box
BP160
60 ft single plug door box
BP250
50 ft double plug door box
CP410
100 ton 4-bay pressurized covered hopper
CPG308
80 ton 3-bay covered hopper, plastic granules loading
FB58
58 ft bulkhead flat
FC7575 ft center beam flat
RM57
57 ft mechanical reefer
TGP23
23000 gal tank car, general purpose loading
TSY1717000 gal tank car, Corn Syrup loading

Locations are next. I figure I'll need to setup 3 locations for the layout: the Office Park zone, the staging tracks, and off-layout storage. Cars will be hand-picked from storage and placed on the staging tracks to make the train. Afterward, they will be moved back to storage by hand.

Many years ago, I was fortunate enough to get a copy of the CN Winnipeg Terminal Car Control manual.  Unfortunately, it's packed away in a moving box and I don't know which one.  Fortunately, Bill Brillinger scanned a copy and made it available on this site ( https://forum.mrhmag.com/post/an-incredible-resource-april-1990-cn-winnipeg-terminal-car-control-manual-12200926). Car control manuals are an invaluable resource as they show how the real railroads setup their switching areas, assigned customer/spur/spot numbers, etc.  I'm doing something similar for my spurs.

ocations.PNG 

Looking at 3502, that customer spur has 2 spots plus an off-spot. I use an X.Y notation to specify the individual spot locations on that spur.

I'm still working on the routes and spurs.  I'm not sure yet if the staging tracks should be a 'staging' 'interchange', or 'yard' location.  I'll need to play around with building trains to see which one works best.

Road Trip!

I finally had some time to take a day trip to Dallas for some prototype research.  Google Earth and Maps are great, but nothing beats actually being there.

DSC03575.JPG 

It can be challenging to shoot through a chain link fence! On the prototype, the latex distribution facility and lumber distributor are side-by-side. The lumber building is at ground level so the spur is about 3 feet below ground.

DSC03590.JPG 

DSC03584.JPG 

The Latex distribution facility is an excellent candidate for a simple industry. There's a concrete surface on both sides of the track.  On the backside is a portable ladder for access to the tank tops. On the front there's a run of 5 pipes.  When unloading, crews bring in a portable pump and connect between the tank and appropriate pipe.  The storage tanks are located a short ways away, so this little piece would make a great little industry along the front edge of the layout.

DSC03642.JPG 

Here's the backside of Rudy's Tortillas.  It has spots for unloading two Pressure-Differential cars at one time.  There are a couple of doors further down but they don't appear to be used anymore.

DSC03643.JPG 

Here we see what's found in those silos.  All connections are well labeled and the area is well maintained.  When unloading a car, workers place a sign with each hose to indicate what product is being unloaded.

DSC03648.JPG 

Rhino Linings, the company that makes spray-on protective coverings has a facility in a generic warehouse.  Here's an example of a warehouse spot taking tank cars. During business hours, workers open the loading door and drag out a hose to connect to the tank car being unloaded. At the end of the day, the hose is brought back in. The placard shows the contents of the closest tank belongs to group 3082, a catch-all for hazardous liquid materials. There is a wheel chock found on each tank car, not just one at the end of the whole cut of cars.

I also stopped in at the local hobby shop.  While there, I met a fellow who happened to be a Cotton Belt modeler and also had done drawings of all the spurs and customer spots in 1989. Just like the CN Car Control manual, these are an incredible wealth of information.  I'll be reviewing the drawings over the next few days to get a better idea of the types of industries that existed back then. From my initial perusal, plastics industries were not common yet like they are today.

Craig

See what's happening on the Office Park Zone at my blog: http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/blog/49643

Reply 0
Bill Brillinger

Road Trip...

Gathering information in the field. - Love it!

Bill Brillinger

Modeling the BNML in HO Scale, Admin for the RailPro User Group, and owner of Precision Design Co.

Reply 0
Karle

Mounting track on foam

Joe Fugate in the latest MRH advises against attaching track to foam because Joe claims the foam expands and contacts too much with temperature changes.  Do you have a concern with your shelf layout?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reply 0
Craig Thomasson BNML2

I've been reading that post,

I've been reading that post, and also contributed a comment based on my own negative experience with using the 2" blue foam in a couple of modules I built.  There are a few differences though.

  • The modules were stored in a trailer and were subject to the large temperature changes found in Central Texas.  The shelf layout will be indoors where the temperature range should only be between 68 and 74 degrees year round.  The discussions so far have been that shrinkage tends to occur when foam is exposed to temperature extremes (primarily extreme hot temperatures).
  • On the modules, the foam was only secured to the wood frame around the edges of the foam piece. On the shelf layout, the foam is laminated to the wood door surface. My thoughts are that since the foam on the modules were glued to such a small surface area around the edges, it was much easier for the foam to pull away from the wood as it shrank. On the shelf layout, having an entire surface laminated to the wood means it should he harder for the foam to shrink because it has much more glued surface area to pull against. It may outgas and become less dense, but the wood it is laminated to should prevent it from shrinking in length too much.
  • When the foam does shrink, it appears to shrink pretty uniformly. I never had any actual operational problems with the modules as the foam shrank.  The track on the modules, even across glued splice joints ran fine, never developed any kinks, etc.  The main problem was at the module joints where the gaps slowly got a bit bigger.  Also, since the foam separated from the frame, the track would still "float" even though the frame had been securely attached and leveled to adjacent modules.

One thing I am thinking about doing is cutting away small areas of foam at the joints under the main track so I can put in a small block of wood. That would provide a secure and level base for the track to be attached to at the joints.

Another concern brought up in that post is the manufacturing thickness tolerances.  Quite frankly, I'm not worried about a difference in foam thickness of 1/16" over a distance of 5-10 feet. That works out to 5 scale inches in HO, or less than the height of code 70 rail.  Industrial trackage is rarely flat as glass. Heck, even mainline trackage often has rolling undulations larger than that!

I think a lot has to do with your environment and benchwork design/construction.  Foam may work great in some cases, and be lousy in others. For me, the hobby is like a lifelong experiment. I've seen and tried things in the past. Some ideas have worked, others haven't. Now, let's try something different and see where that goes!

 

Craig

See what's happening on the Office Park Zone at my blog: http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/blog/49643

Reply 0
Karle

Thanks for the answer Craig.

Thanks for the answer Craig. I am starting my 3rd layout and mulling over foam.  Your answer is helpful. 

Reply 0
Craig Thomasson BNML2

Benchwork changes

The additional height that the shelf brackets required to clear the bookshelf was bothering me.  The layout was a little to high even for my liking.

I got some different shelf brackets and spent the afternoon in the shop modifying them so they will come out at the same height as the bookshelf.

5_212557.jpg 

It made a big difference even though I only lowered it by about 3 inches.

I also got some boards for the upper shelf to test fit. Eventually the upper shelf will have a valence and LED lighting attached to the underside.

Craig

See what's happening on the Office Park Zone at my blog: http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/blog/49643

Reply 0
Reply