Rob_C

Since I was a kid camping and hiking in the Eastern Sierra Nevada Mountains of California I would always survey the terrain as we drove and hiked.  Each curve and grade an enticing challenge for steel wheels on steel rails.  I'd imagined a route a railroad might have used to open up the vast interior of the high Sierra.  Without a map, it's hard to imagine just how much open space there really is up there:  Alpine meadows that are miles long and miles wide, saddles, valleys, canyons and of course snow-capped peaks.

Many years later I learned of the SP/Carson and Colorado narrow gauge that ran in the desert below the mountains.  And then some years later still I learned of the Bodie and Benton RR that aimed to connect the California towns of Benton down in the Owens valley at about 5,300 feet with the gold rush town of Bodie a mere 3,300 feet higher.  Through a series of switchbacks the railroad sidestepped down a near vertical mountain range to reach timber at lower altitudes in the Mono basin at around 6,300 feet.  When the gold rush in Bodie dried up around the turn of the century, so did the plan to finish the line and connect with the C&C in Benton.

There is a stark beauty to the landscape of the Bodie and Benton, but it's not particularly compelling for me as my mostly desert modern UP line gives me this type of scenery in spades.


The end of the line on the B&B: Bodie, CA - now a ghost town.

But it does provide an operational framework for my idea that I will present here, for a freelance railroad of similar scope to the B&B, that I've dubbed the Horseshoe & Cottonwood.  Named for the fictional towns it connects, places that are rooted very much in the real world, one hundred or so miles south of where the B&B ran.  And like the B&B, the H&C aims to connect with the SP/C&C near Lone Pine, California to provide more operational interest depending on what era I finally choose for the layout.  I've narrowed it down to the late 1890's or 1911.  More on that later.  And of course climbing the eastern face of the Sierra Nevada will hopefully provide some operational interest with the required switchbacks, gaining altitude from Owenyo at about 3,800 feet to the highest point on the line, Cottonwood Lakes at about 11,200 feet.  Now that's a climb worthy of any Colorado narrow gauge!

The Space:

Every model railroader first has to contend with a few unfortunate laws of the universe, the principal being where do I build this thing?  In my case the garage will always be reserved for my modern UP layout.  There will be a certain synergy that the modern operations essentially model the same geographic area, just 100 or so years later!  But lessons learned from scenery work, backdrops, colors, and ground cover will all be useful for the narrow gauge layout.

With the garage taken, that left a spare 15X15 room, plus a 10X10 office, and some space in the work room for the H&C.  The multiple rooms work well for what essentially is a mainline with 2-3 branches at its ends.  However holes in the walls will have to be kept to a minimum. 

The Premise:

Like the B&B, the H&C exists because gold was discovered in a rather inhospitable place, high in the Sierra Nevada Mountains.  In this case, in the Cottonwood Lakes basin springing forth the fictional town of Cottonwood Lakes.  The lakes and the basin do exist in the real world at the nosebleed altitude of about 11,200 feet, right about at the tree line. 

es_Trail.jpg 
Site of the town of Cottonwood Lakes at Cottonwood Lake #1 looking west.

ood_Topo.jpg 
Topography view of the lake shown above with the line switch backing east down into the canyon.

Gold was discovered in the lakes basin in the 1890's, but the winters were brutal.  Unlike Bodie, here heavy Sierra snow can stack up 10 feet without pause.  A supply line was needed to keep the miners going year round and that means lots of plowing, shoveling, and plenty of wood fuel and other goods.  Conditions are slightly less harsh down at Horseshoe Meadows, and there is plenty of flat land for a lumber mill and ample nearby timber. 

rseshoe1.jpg 
Site of the town of Horseshoe Meadows along Horseshoe Creek.

What follows is a brief route guide from Cottonwood Lakes down to Cottonwood Junction and over to Horseshoe Meadows.  After switch backing down into Cottonwood Canyon, the line passes a small wooded hollow named after John Muir. Muir Glen is the site of a few gold mines and mining cabins, but not much else. 

od_Topo2.jpg 
From Muir Glen the canyon widens into a lush meadow where the Golden Trout Lumber camp is located.  Its logs help keep the mill in Horseshoe Meadows busy.  Today it's the site of the Golden Trout Fish Camp. 

od_Topo3.jpg 

The canyon empties into a larger canyon at Cottonwood Junction where there is a wye and a small yard.  Other industries here to be determined, but possibly another logging camp or mining enterprise.  Trains can be broken up or put together here to be sent up or down the switchbacks in smaller chunks.  Due east is the mainline down to Lone Pine and the C&C connection in Owenyo.  The line heading southwest continues to Horseshoe Meadows.

od_Topo4.jpg 

From Cottonwood Junction the line crests Horseshoe Summit, ambles past the logging village of Last Chance Meadow before either continuing to the end of the line in the broad flatlands of Horseshoe Meadows, or taking the short branch line to the silver mining town of Round Valley.

The mainline's spectacular 5,000 foot drop into the Owens Valley will be explored in a future post.  Essentially you have a gold mining town being supported by the larger town of Horseshoe Meadows, which will contain a mill, engine facilities, and about every other creature comfort you'd expect in the Wild West.  The railroad is the lifeline for these towns with the rest of the world through the C&C down in the valley. 

Thoughts welcome on the premise, any historical inaccuracies, or anything else that springs forth.

Next: The Layout Plans

 

Reply 0
Rob_C

Layout Plans Naturally a

Layout Plans

Naturally a model railroad with a 7,400 foot elevation gain would work beautifully if built in a two story living room with sizeable square footage for bench work on both levels with a more realistic true-to-scale climb from the first floor to the second.  But not having a cooperative house, some adjustments had to be made!

The original plan was for the Owens Valley to be on the first level at about two feet off the ground.  From Owenyo, the line would almost immediately start switch backing up the “front range” of the Sierra until it was about four and a half or five feet off the ground; the idea being that the upper deck would top out at about eye level at Cottonwood Lakes.  Here’s “The Face” as seen from Lone Pine (near Owenyo). 

mosaic-3.jpg 

However there is an obvious problem with this: The Alabama Hills!  The line has to snake its way through them first to get to the base of the Sierra Nevada and that would not be possible trying to showcase Owenyo and Lone Pine AND the Face climb in the same scene.  I can just see myself now like the famous cartoon from Bill Shanahan’s Scenery for Model Railroads where leaning over too many feet of mountains results in an outline of oneself crashed through the mountainside.  What follows is a rough outline of the route from the crest at a very long tunnel pass through the mountains just east of Cottonwood Junction down to Lone Pine.

ace_Topo.jpg 

“The Face” roughly inhabits the present day road, with a lot more twisting and turning to accommodate an easier grade.  The road is in excess of 10% while the railroad has to keep things closer to 3.5%. 

ow-road1.jpg 
Here’s the road as viewed from the valley below.

As mentioned before, the Alabama Hills precluded doing a scene of Owenyo and Lone Pine with the Face in the background.  So the layout curves around on a second peninsula to gain altitude allowing for the Face to be on the second deck by itself.  This has the additional benefit of dedicating the rest of the first level to the Alabama Hills climb and industries.  The C&C narrow gauge takes up the rest of the first level in the office which allows for a major terminus in the north at Laws, engine facilities, and a turn-back loop.

The curves are tight, even for Hon3 at 18” minimum, however these can probably be kept to 22” on the main with a little work.  Laws has a hidden reverse loop that disappears below some buildings to duck just under the mainline and re-appears in the same fashion on the other side of the yard.  It allows a train to be turned or for continuous operation, though it’s hard to say this layout will have any sort of continuous operations with the switch backs! So perhaps this loop will be removed in later drafts.  The turntable would suffice for locomotive repositioning, and there is a wye in Owenyo that will accommodate a loco and a caboose or two. 

Aberdeen and Zurich really didn’t have much going for them on the C&C except water towers so that’s all I’ve shown here.  Instead we get a nice mainline run to Owenyo where the bulk of operations happen. 

Owenyo on the C&C was the transfer point with the standard gauge SP connection to points south.  It was also where the C&C veers off to the southeast and it’s terminus in Keeler, CA.  There is a wye here to represent that, and I made a point to keep the C&C and H&C trackage separate.  If I do opt for a 1911 time period the H&C will be dual gauge as it would share a dual gauge main with the SP Jawbone branch as far as Diaz before heading up into the hills.  But prior to 1911 there would be no Jawbone standard gauge branch if I do opt for the late 1800’s time period.  More on that later.

Lone Pine is just south of Owenyo on the H&C/Jawbone Branch.  Its main industry is just south of town in Diaz in the form of a meat packing plant.  One of the prime industries of the Owens Valley was cattle ranching.  In addition to the valley itself, the high Sierra meadows make excellent grazing lands and driving cattle up and down before the winter set in was one honest way to make a living.  Transport by rail may figure into the layout as well.  But historically using the meadows for cattle was really only necessary after 1913 when the LA Aqueduct had drained enough water from the valley to turn it into the desert it is today. The result was the loss of grazing lands in the valley.

nwood_L1.jpg 

After the climb out of Diaz into Lubken Canyon the layout moves onto level 2 about 3 feet off the ground at first until it gets enough distance from the lower deck to offer comfortable fiddling with the yard at Owenyo.  If necessary a switchback could be added to gain elevation in the canyon.  This will become clearer after construction has begun. 

nwood_L2.jpg 

As trains ascend to level 2 they pass through Lubkin Flats, a small cattle ranching operation just west of the Alabama Hills.  This is also the location of the last passing siding before Cottonwood Junction.  The sidings should be frequent enough to handle a fair amount of traffic on the line with the obvious bottleneck being the switch backs.  Space permitting, I am considering adding another passing siding on the switch back just uphill from the Carroll Creek loop, but space will be tight.  After the loop, the switch backs are negotiated, ideally with enough space for about 8-10 cars and a locomotive.  With the grades and curves any longer trains would probably be problematic.  But that length creates operational interest when trains need to be brought up through the switch backs in sections.  There is also one industry on The Face, the Langley Silver Mine with a couple of spurs, which should provide some interest coordinating with mainline trains.  After the top switch back the train enters a long tunnel onto the top level of the layout into the alpine scenery. 

od_L3(3).jpg 

Cottonwood Junction is the next siding and there is a small yard for breaking up trains and serving a local industry or two.  On the west side of town a wye sends traffic either to the gold mining town of Cottonwood Lakes, or to Horseshoe Meadows, the larger support community. 

Diverging right, the line follows the Cottonwood Creek through Cottonwood Canyon, climbing through alpine meadows and the logging camp at Golden Trout Camp and the smaller gold mines at Muir Glen.  From here the railroad really climbs again, and unfortunately there is no space to depict the half dozen or so switch backs up to the lakes basin.  The town itself is on the banks of one of the lakes. It includes a stamp mill, small rail yard, and turntable. No space for fancy wyes here or on the prototype.

If we take a left at Cottonwood Junction the line climbs to Horseshoe Summit before leveling off through the timber driven village of Last Chance Meadow and then into Horseshoe Meadows proper.  Just inside the meadow is the wye (not shown as a wye, but this may be possible) leading to the silver mine at Round Valley.  Mainline trains continue another mile or so to the northwest end of the meadow where the town is situated.  Trains arrive in the town of Horseshoe Meadows after running through a closet and out into my work room.  Plans are a bit more in flux for this part of the layout, but it will include a saw mill, sizeable town, yard, and engine facility to help keep the trains running year round. 

Rolling Stock

One of my conundrums with the era has to do with the locomotive roster.  I particularly like the look of the 2-8-0’s with an oil tender.  However that was only seen on the SP narrow gauge after the turn of the century, well after wood fired power was out of style.  I have yet to find examples of coal tenders in this area, so much of the available D&RGW motive power will need modification.  I suspect this is because there just wasn’t a lot of coal in the area, and oil was cheaper to transport.  Given the ready timber in the area it is plausible the H&C would still use wood even after the SP switched to oil.  I guess it’s one of those areas where aesthetics and practical availability of equipment may win out.

Like the SP and C&C, much of the rolling stock will be based on flat cars.  More research will need to be done here.  I hope to also introduce some passenger service to the line.

So as always, comments welcome and appreciated with the track plan or anything else.  Let’s spot any problems now.  Thanks!

Reply 0
ChrisS

Wow, very impressive plan and

Wow, very impressive plan and interesting concept.  I particularly like the protolance, early Western narrow gauge theme - my own plans are to model a hypothetical group of shortlines in Southern Utah in 1907.  I'll definitely be following your progress.

As for the era decision, I think I'd go with something in the 1911-1918 era if I were you, for a few reasons.  First, I like the idea of having some dual gauge, as it can add some operational interest and standard-to-narrow-gauge interchanges are just fascinating to look at, as well as helpful in explaining narrow gauge to the layman.  It's also a really interesting time of transition for narrow gauge motive power, especially in your region of the West.  You could very credibly have a mix of wood and oil burners, diamond and straight or capped stacks, short and extended smokeboxes, 4-4-0s and 2-8-0s, Russia Iron and black boilers, etc.  That's why I settled on 1907 rather than the 1890s (I might have gone a few years later, but I wanted to include Rio Grande Western equipment to emphasize the Utah setting, and the RGW was consolidated into the D&RG in 1908).

Another thing that comes to mind looking at your plan is whether you've thought through a phased construction - are there manageable chunks you can build to prevent it from becoming overwhelming?  Laws to Owenyo seems like a logical starting point.

Lastly, if you don't already have it, I recommend getting Mallory Hope Ferrell's book "Nevada Central: Sagebrush Narrow Gauge."  I've found it very inspirational, and I suspect you would too.

valley20.jpg 

Freelancing 1907 Southern Utah in Sn3

http://redrocknarrowgauge.blogspot.com/

Reply 0
ctxmf74

"So as always, comments

Quote:

"So as always, comments welcome and appreciated with the track plan or anything else.  Let’s spot any problems now.  Thanks!"

Given the size of the rooms I think you need to distil the plan  down a bit so it's not so dense feature wise. I'd eliminate the Owenyo to Laws segment and start the on scene operations at Owenyo.That would allow the climb to start on the lowest level and simplify the design of the higher levels. I'd build Owenyo at 36 inches or higher since anything lower is hard to live with. 36 inches allows an office chair to fit under the benchwork so it's possible to sit down and work on the lowest level. I'd then place the highest level near my standing eye height and divide up the elevation difference into a workable grade to determine how many levels and switchbacks are needed. I can imagine it will take a lot of foam or plaster scenery to convey the look of the mountains so you better enjoy that part of the hobby? Alternately one could design a layout featuring Owenyo and the standard gauge interchange and just use staging to simulate the line running up to the mountains to avoid building all that scenery.Owenyo and the SP on the valley floor would be a pretty simple layout to construct and would fit nicely in that space.....DaveB

Reply 0
joef

Layout height

You would do well to mock up some of this using cardboard boxes, etc to see how the deck heights will work. In my experience, the deck separation in actual practice can be a lot less than you think and you can get the lower deck up higher off the floor. On my Siskiyou Line, I have found a deck separation of 13" is plenty in most cases. But before you cut your first stick of lumber, mock this up and place some sections of track and some rolling stock on it. Then study the mockup for a while, adjusting as necessary to see what you will like best. Mockups are key to getting a multideck layout you can live with - and they'll save you a lot of frustration later. Moving already constructed benchwork is no fun, so do your homework first with mockups.

Joe Fugate​
Publisher, Model Railroad Hobbyist magazine

[siskiyouBtn]

Read my blog

Reply 0
Rob_C

Thanks, I appreciate the

Thanks, I appreciate the comments so far.  Interesting notes about the eras, Chris.  I am definitely leaning towards 1911 for some of the reasons you mention.

My current multi-level was definitely done in stages with the first level operational very quickly between two large towns.  I agree, it really helps keep you going!  I haven't seen Ferrell's book but will look for it.  I have Slim Rails Through the Sand which has some excellent history and modelling portfolio of the C&C/SP.

Dave you make some excellent points.  Having gone a little "low" with my current layout at just a foot off the ground, I anticipated two feet would at least allow me to install tortoises and help keep some dust and dirt off this time around, but perhaps a bit higher would be better.  I'm not getting any younger, and while sitting on the floor indian style is fine now, in another 20 years who knows.   

Here's a quick shot of the current UP layout with its crammed levels. 

17_28_08.jpg 

Luckily making mountains is immensly enjoyable for me right down to the bragdon rock molds, and possibly one of the primary reasons for the layout is to show the railroad tackling them.  I think the only room with enough space for the switchbacks is the main room which left the office not really doing much on the main level hence the extension to Laws, but perhaps that could just be staging instead since it doesn't add much except an expensive amount of trackwork and buildings.  But as Chris points out it does allow for some point to point operations right away.  Definitely stuff to think about!

Reply 0
Chris Ellis

Wow! I would love to see more

Wow! I would love to see more photos of that UP layout. A extreme multideck with a closer than typical level separation is something I've considered in the past. It neat to see someone actually build one. It does look like you could've taken everything about 12" higher. Certainly a type of layout that's not for everyone, but it definitely packs in a lot of running.

Reply 0
Logger01

Photo Tour?

I am with Chris. I would really like to see a photo tour of your current layout, but I am also looking forward to pictures and videos of your new layout.

Ken K

gSkidder.GIF 

Reply 0
Rob_C

photos and stuff

Thanks Ken and Chris.  There are a few more photos in my blog but I'll do some more soon now that I'm on spring break. FYI the tall guy on the left of the photo is like 6'5" so you could go a foot higher, but the kids would all need step stools.  haha

Joe, I appreciate your thought about mockups.  When I first started my modern layout, I went around the garage with masking tape to get a sense of the heights.  Later adding some temporary decks to show how far the deck might come out from the wall and what it would obstruct.  Ideally it'd be good to do that for the whole layout, seeing everything in 3D.  I briefly thought about building it in 3D on the computer, but quickly realized that would be a monumental undetaking in and of itself, so said heck with it and just started building.  It's so easy to get overwhelmed by these projects I'm kind of glad I did.  I got stalled out on the first layout I tried to build about 10 years ago and never finished it.  So I was really determined this time around, and I hope that determination keeps up through a narrow guage entry and the eventual replacement of the modern layout.  Going the step further and putting down some track might have save me some headache when I made the rookie mistake of grading with degrees instead of percent at first.  The trains still haven't forgiven me, though they generally handle 3.8 respectibly in the one or two places it gets that steep where it was meant to be closer to 2.  But backing trains up that... forget about it!

Reply 0
Reply