DKRickman

If you've ever tried to mount a Kadee coupler on the front of a steam locomotive, or on the rear of an F-unit, or in any of a number of other tight spots, you know it's sometimes impossible to fit the coupler and box in there and keep something close to a prototypical coupling distance.  Usually, that means the coupler sticks out too far, or you have to resort to drastic measures like cutting off the rear of the coupler shank and drilling a new hole in the remaining shank stub.

But maybe there's a better way?

I was looking at the Kadee web site today, and I noticed the NEM couplers.  I've never bothered to look at them, since I don't run any European equipment which might need such a coupler.  But look closely...

I see a Kadee coupler head with a VERY short shank, mounted to the NEM adaptor via a (metal?) pin, and centered with a bit of spring wire.  I'll bet you could modify that adaptor (or simply build your own) to fit in all sorts of super-tight spots.  Coupler swing would be very limited, but I'm thinking you'd get enough to make it work in most cases.  The worst case scenario would be two such couplers coupled together (such as between F units) trying to go through an S-curve.  It might take a little experimenting to figure out what the practical limits are.

Is this another hair-brained idea, or could this actually work in some cases?

Ken Rickman

Danville & Western HO modeler and web historian

http://southern-railway.railfan.net/dw/

Reply 0
proto87stores

The NEM shank is low as well as short

Check you can comfortably cut the end opening and mount the shank lower as well.

Andy

Reply 0
DKRickman

Lower is easier than higher

For things like F units, having the attachment point lower shouldn't be an issue - in fact, it should give more room to make the mount.  For the front of a steam loco, it might be an issue in a few cases - but then again, a lot of the problem locos I've seen are problems in part because of very low deck heights.

I was also thinking that the coupler head could be used to represent the couplers which were mounted in link & pin pockets on many locomotives, especially on narrow gauge, logging, or mining lines.  I think I may have to try this when I get home!

Ken Rickman

Danville & Western HO modeler and web historian

http://southern-railway.railfan.net/dw/

Reply 0
Ironhand_13

Hmmm...

my Spectrum Doodlebug (HO scale) has a dummy front coupler.  I've seen online where people have cut the shank off a standard Kadee, drilled a hole near the head, and mounted a tiny pin on the body to have a working one.  This looks like a better idea, and might actually not need any modification.  I'll have to look this up for dimensions and such.  Thanks!!

-Steve in Iowa City
Reply 0
DKRickman

Neat

Let me know how it works, Ironhand.  If people are already using something mechanically similar, I would think it would work well enough - do they have any issues with coupler swing on curves?

Ken Rickman

Danville & Western HO modeler and web historian

http://southern-railway.railfan.net/dw/

Reply 0
Reply