fredminxis75
Hi there,
 
Do you feel a desire to continually ‘improve’ the modelling work and simulation (train running) practices you do and the layout itself? And by ‘improve’ I mean what kinds of things you feel you need to improve on and/or do to the layout.
 
Following on from that would you say that you a ‘striver’ for realism, what is realism for you and when is that point where you say right that's enough I am happy with that'.
 
-----
 PS. I would like to better formally introduce myself, I am undertaking an academic research project that partly explores the hobby of model railways. I am based in the UK and I am actually interviewing UK-based railway modellers (about 20 so far and won't do any more for a while I think) but am posting questions on forums like this so as to get some more ideas, besides actually looking through previous forum threads for any interesting stuff. You are very very welcome to enquire more about the research project from me where I can give you some more info and most welcome to PM me if you want to discuss issues not on public forums. I can be contacted at rjm11@aber.ac.uk and have a website or two, just type 'Robert MacKinnon Aberystwyth' into Google. On a side note I have done some railway modelling in the past and actually doing the project has enthused me to take it up again!

 

Rob MacKinnon

Researcher, Aberystwyth University, UK
Project: The geographies of fidelity: Wargames, Hydraulics and Model Railways.
 Please feel free at any time to contact me about this research project (details on personal uni website link below)  

My personal university website (with contact details):
http://www.aber.ac.u...taff/phd/rjm11/

My Academia.edu website
http://aber.academia...RobertMacKinnon

Reply 0
dkaustin

Have you looked at a few of the forums here?

Weekend Photo Fun should give you a good example of realism.

Then there is the "Yes, It's a Model." Heading on some of the pages you pull up here.  If you download the March issue there is a whole article devoted to that subject.  That ought to answer your questions on realism.

Den

n1910(1).jpg 

     Dennis Austin located in NW Louisiana


 

Reply 0
Ironhand_13

I see a column coming

Wow!  Enter Academia into Model Railroading!  Joe Fugate, I see a column coming!

Anyways, this could be a sticky subject, one that has been bantered around for years.  'Realism' is in the eye of the beholder, so is "accuracy in realism" in my opinion.  Myself, I'm not a 'rivet-counter'.  To me a boxcar is a boxcar, but I model the 50's so it needs to be a 50's boxcar not a modern one.  They do look different and are certainly different sizes, so it wouldn't look right to me.  If I didn't know any better I wouldn't care, but once I knew better through research accidental or intentional, then there'd be a problem.  I recently bought an Atlas PS-2 covered hopper, period-correct but found out later it mostly hauled cement or potash....I wanted it to haul grain!  Now I have to 'justify' it in my mind to use on my layout (it was going to be a track-cleaner car...so was my period-correct PS-1 boxcar but fell in love with it after I weathered it).  No one in my family- the ones that are going to view my layout- will notice anything goofy about a covered PS-2 hopper in farm-country hauling grain to the Budweiser brewing facility in St. Louis on my layout.  I probably won't have any NMRA or club-folk in my train-room to go "ah...that's wrong" so again, it's in the 'eye of the beholder'...me.

I love scenery.  I love weathering.  I love things that look photo-real.  I look at what I've created/manipulated with paint and go- 'GOOD, now move on'.  BUT I always have the option to add to it or change it later.  My wife CONSTANTLY says to me "you'll never be done, at least in your eyes".  Probably true, but I can't believe it.  To me there is a goal to any project, and a goal means there is an end-point.  Accomplishment or failure, but failure just means "okay, that didn't work, so try it this way".  Model Railroading is not a finite thing.  Guys have done a layout, torn it all down and started over...then torn it down again and started over , then torn it down....etc.  Sometimes it's to change the modeled location, sometimes to change era, sometimes because it wasn't prototypical (meaning based on the actual real-world track layout) and they wanted things more 'real'. 

Real is I guess as real as what you want it to be.  To some, real means 'it works!!'- all electric connections work and the things actually pulls these little plastic train boxcars around. To others there has to be moving DCC-controlled birds in the sky, and a slowly-setting sun, and the cars and people all have to move, and a scale HO mile is really a scale HO mile in their train room (do the math...it is quite a long way in that train room).

Rule #1 is: My layout, My rules.

-Steve in Iowa City
Reply 0
Reply