Moose2013

I need to understand the math to install an Atlas 3.5 Wye to connect two parallel tracks to converge via the wye into one track.

The center-lines of the parallel tracks will be ~ 3 to 4 inches apart, depending on what radius and length of track I need to make this work. I will be running passenger cars, so it is critical that I have good length and radii for this...

I'm in the process of designing a reverse loop. I would have liked to simply use a #10 right turnout, but as there are no such items of reasonable price any where on the planet at the moment ... Well, one must make do with that which one has access...

0030913A.jpg 

Reply 0
CM Auditor

Moose, you are overthinking the problem

Recommendation.

What railroad are you modeling?  What era?  In the 70s ti oresebt  the double track centerline was normally 16 to 20 feet apart.  In the 20s to 50s the track centerline was 13 feet.

For a high speed passenger line give yourself two passenger lengths to transition from the wye to the mainline track so you don't induce any "ess curves" into your track and by eye lay your track.  That way your passenger trains will smoothly transit the track with no violent moves or jerks and your engineer doesn't have to worry about the ladies in the parlor car spilling their drinks.

CM Auditor

Tom VanWormer

Monument CO

Colorado City Yard Limits 1895

Reply 0
David Husman dave1905

Eyeball it

A 3.5 wye is the equivalent of a #7 switch.

Just install flex track and eyeball in the flextrack.  If it looks like a smooth curve it will operate smooth.

Dave Husman

Visit my website :  https://wnbranch.com/

Blog index:  Dave Husman Blog Index

Reply 0
ctxmf74

Just install flex track and eyeball in the flextrack

Yeah ,much faster than trying to calc  it out. If you have the switch temporarily tack it and some flextrack down in the desired configuration and push some of your longest cars thru it to see how it works then adjust the design if necessary. Way more fun to play with the trains than to play with the numbers.

Reply 0
Moose2013

Over thinking a problem? Who? Me?

...You know me better than you thought!

Seriously, eyeing relative track placement would be difficult given what I'm trying to lay out. Working through the numbers makes it easier for me to understand what difficulties I might have and how to avoid them.

People enjoy RR modeling for various reasons, part of my enjoyment comes from playing with the numbers.

Oh, I should have mentioned, the reverse loop will be hidden, so I'm not concerned about the prototypical esthetic.

I found an Atlas no. 7 left-hand turnout that I am going to use instead of a 3.5 wye, and I'm going to assume a radius, based on NMRA standards. Here's the numbers, 'cause, ya'know, I like numbers...

0030913A.jpg 

Reply 0
CM Auditor

Get out your Transit and have a ball

If the visual impact is not important, then you decide what you want L to be and solve for the solution.  If the visuals are of concern than L should be the length of the longest cars you plan on running.  If you want to be prototype than the frog numbers for the turnout should be a #14 or higher for a high speed situation.

CM Auditor

Tom VanWormer

Monument CO

Colorado City Yard Limits 1895

Reply 0
Reply