You are hereBlogs / kcsphil1's blog / New Year New Layout - Update #10 -UPDATED 21 July

New Year New Layout - Update #10 -UPDATED 21 July


kcsphil1's picture

By kcsphil1 - Posted on 02 May 2009

Following the "completion" of my latest scratchbuilding project (see Update #9), I have started to get back to work on the layout.  Since I'm running a lot of diapering actions, and mowing the lawn, doing the dishes, etc, I'm trying to keep the work simple and small.

I installed the first two of my Humpyard Purveyance Switch controllers:

I decided to use these for remote switch control, rather then switch machines, because I thought that throwing switches manually was more prototypical for an industrial switching layout then remote powered control.  Plus, its simpler to maintain.  And since I don't like to oversize look of manual ground throws attached to the switch, these are a really good alternative.

Under the layout, it looks like this:

I'm controlling the switch points using bell cranks formed from surplus lengths of the steel wire supplied with the kits.  I've learned that short tails on the under benchwork portion of the bell crank translates in to full throw of the switch points within the range of motion of the throwbar on the panel facia.

On to the next thing . . .

 

 

UPDATE (21 July):

So, doing some switching over the weekend to show off progress to my 11 year old, the linkage to the left in the above photo seems to be sliding along the bellcrank wire.  Not sure what the fix is, but I'll post it when I have one.

Meanwhile I've been eyeing up the new Fast Tracks Bullfrog turnout controllers - but I'm wondering if they will work using a sliding stiff wire as I am here, and not a push rod as other have described.  Thoughts from the peanut gallery always welcome!

Tags
bobcatt's picture

How do you like the action on these? Do you find them well made & robust?

 

 

bobcatt
visit the S Scale Workshop
contribute to the Model Train Wiki!

Scarpia's picture

I'm considering the Humpyards my self, but I'm still waffling on the wiring, specifically with a powered frog. Can you explain how you wired yours? And do you like them?

 

Thanks

Modeling the Central Vemont

www.garbo.org/MRR

kcsphil1's picture

The throws are made out the same Delrin/Slippery plastic that we get Loco handrail is, so I can understand the concern.  Since I'm working in N-scale, the full travel of the throw bar is more then enough to move and hold the switchpoints.  What I've found is that you need to make the under the layout portion of the bell crank fairly short (1/2 inch or a bit more) to allow the throwbar on the "stand" to travel fully.

I haven't used them for frog powering - I'm building a fairly simple switching layout wired for DCC, so I reached a conclusion that powered/insulated frogs weren't necessary.  Since the bench work is built in three segments (or will be, once I get back into the woodshop) I've decided to have each bench work segment wired as a "block" using jumpers between segements. That way, if I have a short, I can disconnect each benchwork section, run it independently, and find and repair the short.

Happy Monday!

Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern Railroad, Mount Rainier Div.

Scarpia's picture

They look so good on the layout. I guess I'll order a couple from him and give them a whirl.

Modeling the Central Vemont

www.garbo.org/MRR

ChrisNH's picture

I'm wondering if they will work using a sliding stiff wire

If I remember, it was using a wire in the demo at the Train Show.

 

Regards,

Chris

“If you carry your childhood with you, you never become older.”           My modest progress Blog

>> Posts index