Comme-N-tary - Coal at Cresson

Your rating: None (33 votes)

Comme-N-tary column - MRH Feb 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 Download this issue!

 Read issue online

 

 

 



 

Please post any comments or questions you have about this column here.

Comments

Not N-scale but all scale

Again an article that is not what I expect from an article made for N-scale, it's all scale and could have been any scale. Imho the N-scale colum should contain articles really special for N-scale, building decoders in N-scale engines, building craftsmen structures in N-scale, etc.  Operations or building a yard have nothing to do with a specific scale.

Don't get me wrong the article is good , but shouldn't be in an N-scale colum.

N Scale is a Funny thing.

N scale is like a pie.  Every one wants a piece of the N-scale pie.  The problem is no one wants to bake the pie.

N-Scale has has two Magazines dedicated to N-Scale,  Seems every other magazine is trying to cash in on the N-Scale Pie with a special column.  

Manufactures are build cars and engines.  So up front every thing looks great at the N-scale Bake off.

The problem is not one manufacture has picked up on the fact you need a layout of some kind to run your trains on. The shortage of Autos/Trucks (Modern era), More Buildings, better track etc. is missing.  

If some one just picked up on the a dn started to put out some nice Modern Building kits,  Up dated Cars and Trucks etc.  I'm sure more people would jump at the for a bite of the N-Scale Pie.

I here this all the time,  I would do N-scale but you have a small choice of structures to choose from or you do not have the selection we have in HO. 

Maybe if you built it people will come.  When was the last time you have seen somthing new or modern in N-Scale that you really wanted?

Eric G. Hall Gila Springs & Mesquite aka "GS&M"

skiloff's picture

N scale

I model the 70s/80s era of N scale and while I would say there is obviously a lot less availability than HO scale of stuff from that era, there are still a lot of options.  While you'll often see the same kits on many layouts, there are still a fair variety of things and bashing that can be done to bring more uniqueness to the model.  I'd suggest the modern era has more variety of vehicles available than the 70s/80s era, but we both know there isn't much to work with in terms of accessory type things like vehicles.  <p>

While "build it they will come" is a nice thought, most manufacturers aren't huge conglomerates and trying something in hopes the market will accept it is a huge risk and could sink many manufacturers if it fails and that doesn't do anyone any good.  I don't begrudge any manufacturer for not taking big risks as much as I'd like them to.  <p>

As for track, I don't know what more you want.  Atlas' line of code 55 is pretty decent, ME track is excellent (what I use for all my flex track and some turnouts), and even handlaying isn't all that difficult with the right tools, such as FastTracks.  <p>

I still think N scale will become more widely used as spaces get smaller and real estate gets more expensive.  But it will never come close to replacing HO and I don't think there is anything wrong with that.

Dave


Working on the N Scale chainsaw
N Scale '70s/80s era
HO Scale "Collector" '70s/80s era
GMT-6

Maybe this is a given and has

Maybe this is a given and has already been discussed somewhere. I am not sure what you actual layout room and track plan is but if the hidden staging was a double ended yard to serve both ends of the line you would be able run forever basically. You would still cut off the motive power and return. You mention the tracks bump into the wall, leading me to believe  your are kind of stuck, but if you could make a turn in the corner to the "other" end of the main line, problem is solved, I think. Anyway enjoyed the article, food for thought in any scale. Thanks! btw, behind in my reading MRH, sorry.

Steve       


>> Posts index

User login